OnEarth Magazine: Subscribe | Current Issue
Your OnEarth: Login / Register
Groundbreaking journalism needs your support
SUBSCRIBE TODAY and enjoy a special introductory offer: A full year for just $15!

Poseidon Lost

We thought the sea was infinite and inexhaustible. It is not. Calling for a new vision to save our oceans. Table of Contents | Digital Edition
Guardian Environmental Network

Green Cars Electrify Detroit Auto Show

The electric Ford Focus is just one in a growing number of hybrid and plug-in vehicles that are reshaping the automotive landscape.
A veteran car correspondent assesses the industry’s changing landscape

The electrification of Motown was in full display this week at the 2011 Detroit Auto Show, which runs through January 23. In the past, press previews at the event have featured carnival-style new car announcements. Not this year, but there was still a subdued sense that although Detroit may not yet be fully recovered from bankruptcy and recession, U.S. automakers are getting back on their feet. And electric cars are emerging as central to that rebirth.

The shift is best captured by GM’s all-in bet on the Volt, a plug-in electric hybrid sedan. It’s hard to understate the scope of GM’s conversion with the Volt. GM was poised to pioneer mainstream electric cars with its EV1 over a decade ago, only to curtail the program in a series of decisions made infamous by the documentary "Who Killed the Electric Car?"

By the mid 2000s, with sales of big SUVs and trucks spinning off proportionally big profits, I can recall senior GM executives disparaging Toyota’s then small-selling Prius as a bad business strategy, describing it as a costly kludge of electric and gas technologies whose price could never cover its cost to build.

Fast forward a few years. Toyota is the biggest carmaker in the world, and the Prius is a global hit. GM meanwhile is struggling back from bankruptcy and is earning kudos for rolling out an e-car that’s similar to the Prius in more than just looks. The Volt is a 60 mpg, four-door sedan that plugs in and runs on a combination of battery power, a gas engine. And it will cost $40,000, a price that -- just like early versions of the Prius -- critics have said can’t cover the true costs of its advanced technologies.

If GM failed to recognize the EV1’s potential, it’s not making the same mistake this time. Just as Toyota has benefited hugely from the green halo that the Prius lends the company’s reputation, GM seems to get that even if early Volts are money losers, the reputational benefits are enormous. Thanks to GM’s huge, years-in-the-making publicity campaign for the vehicle, the public is probably more aware of this car than any new vehicle in recent history, gas or electric.

For all the attention heaped on GM, Ford is also banking on a small fleet of new electric vehicles designed to appeal to a broader set of buyers. The sole U.S. automaker to avoid a government bailout, Ford introduced three new electric vehicles at the show. The most ambitious is the Focus Electric, an all-battery plug in sedan, which can roll 100 miles on a charge. It will cost around $30,000.

Ford also announced two new green micro-vans. The C-Max Energi (yes, with an "i") is a five-passenger "multi-activity" vehicle that -- like Chevy’s Volt -- can be plugged in at night to recharge, then run on only battery power or a mix of battery and gas for a total range of over 500 miles. Its sibling the C-Max Hybrid is a conventional hybrid -- similar to Toyota’s Prius -- that boosts its mileage by switching between battery and gas power and storing energy from braking in a big battery pack. Ford’s C-Max vehicles will hit markets in 2012, and pricing is as yet unavailable.

Even Toyota is hoping an electric shock can help rehabilitate its image. This may seem odd given that the world’s largest automaker has been building electric-gas hybrids for 15 years (the Prius debuted in 1997). Yet Toyota is struggling back from a series of embarrassing quality problems and high-profile recalls that damaged the reputations of its main Toyota and Lexus brands.

Its Prius line, meanwhile, remains untarnished. It is also the most widely-recognized and best selling eco-car in the world. Indeed, Toyota has announced a goal to make Prius the best selling "nameplate" in the world by 2020. Building on this pledge, in Detroit Toyota announced both bigger and smaller versions of the Prius, along with a plug-in hybrid to compete with Chevy’s Volt.

Returning to the question of "Who Killed the Electric Car?" it’s fitting to note that the maker of that documentary is putting the final touches on a sequel, "Revenge of the Electric Car," due in theaters this spring.

image of Adam Aston
Adam Aston is a freelance journalist and editor who focuses on green issues. Previously, Adam was energy and environment editor at BusinessWeek, where he covered corporate sustainability, renewable energy, and green finance while producing a regular ... READ MORE >
Is the $30k price quoted for the 2011 Ford Focus Electric before the $7.5k federal incentive and $5k California incentive?
Hi Richard, Though mostly guesswork at this stage, industry buzz is that Ford will charge less for its battery-powered Focus Electric than GM is asking for the Chevy Volt and aim closer to the price Nissan set for its all-electric Leaf, including incentives. Here's the best thinking I came across, pointing to the $30,000 target price. More here: http://fordfocuselectric.com/2011/01/13/ford-focus-electric-price/
Pretty good article. I think the general public is wary about buying into hybrid and electric only cars. I believe the thinking is, "too new and problematic", and "needs to be on the market for awhile until the bugs are worked out", and "the parts (re: battery(ies)) are too expensive to replace". I have owned a Toyota Prius since 2006 and have gotten these comments and questions repeatedly as well as many others. Since buying the 2006 Prius brand new I had zero problems with it, no repairs and only general maintenance (oil, filters, and tires) for 139,000 miles when I sold it and bought a 2010 Prius V. I now have 50,000 miles on the 2010, had the software upgrade done for the braking recall even though I never had any issue at all with braking or any other problem. I am looking forward to the plug-in Prius for my next car.
Can we please stop calling any car "green"? Electric cars may be low- or no-emissions, but they require energy that has to come from somewhere. And that somewhere is very rarely green.
blah blah blah hybrids... where is the fully electric ev-1? they have it, why won't they release it? CAR COMPANIES, I WANT TO BUY YOUR ELECTRIC CAR NO MORE GAS FOR ME. PLEASE. Seriously though hybrids are a step in the right directions but this isn't the time for baby steps. I'm ready when you are.
"Green" is the new feel good buzz word. Everyone (well a lot of us anyway) wants to be "Green". But like Kermit says, "it isn't easy being green". To utilize the word "Green" - as it applies to being socially and environmentally responsible - may mean different things to different people. As the previous writer declares it means "zero energy use", but others may believe it to be reducing dependance on foreign oil, or reducing your carbon footprint. I doubt anyone can say they have zero impact on the eath's natural resources, or that it is even possible for a human to live without using some form of energy that contributes to air, water or land pollution. All we can do is try the best we can to have a minimal impact on the earth while continuing to perform our duties of making a living and enjoying our leisure time. ....that my friends is being "green". Fuel efficient vehicles have been around for 60 years, and we have taken a big step backward with huge SUVs. To turn this back to where we were 60 years ago is no small task as auto manufacturers only deliver what consumers are willing to buy. All electric vehicles to be used by the masses will need to be implemented along with charging stations all over and the the electricity used to be from a renewable generation souce. This shift will take a whole lot of mind changing not only by the general population but also by large corporations, small business owners, utilities, municipal management and our fickle U.S. Congress. This is the reality.
now we just need 100,000,000 more to think the same, and be willing to step up
The whole problem is energy storage (that is electrical energy)! As of today no battery storage device is capable of releasing the same amount of energy required to recharge it! All battery storage devices on the market requires a lot more energy to recharge (between 8 and 16 hours on a normal charge, 4 to 7 hours on a quick charge). The goal would be to have an electrical storage device that could be recharged in the same time , as it could discharge, sounds simple, right!!!!!!!!!! I have researched and bought many electrical storage devices (batteries), all with the many other problems!!!! But interesting enough, I came across a device that seem to do just that, but I am sure it will cost us all plenty! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFcylXFGTgk