Green Me

by Laura Wright

Parque/Zefa/Corbis

(Page 2 of 2)

While Ready, Set, Green fits neatly into the one-size-fits-all category, many of the books piled up in my office most certainly do not. Some of them, like Big Green Purse, instruct shopaholic moms on how to buy their way green. Others, such as YOU CAN PREVENT GLOBAL WARMING (and save money!), are for those who worry most about climate change. For them, there's also a book about adopting an eco-chic, low-carb lifestyle, How to Live a Low-Carbon Life. And then there's Go Green: How to Build an Earth-Friendly Community, for those who have already cleaned up their own act and are looking to indoctrinate everyone around them. And of course there are titles that are just so foolishly specific that I don't know why anyone would buy them. One example is Biking to Work. Do we need a book for this?

Some books offer ways to save money by saving the earth, and some show how you can spend money saving the earth. Among the former, there's Go Green, Live Rich, by David Bach, with the help of science writer Hillary Rosner. Bach is the guy who has written nine "get rich" books in the past nine years, selling more than six million copies. I always wondered who actually bought these things, a notion that stems from my sense that I should be able to figure this out without the help of a guy who's getting rich selling me books about trying to get rich. But in the end, Go Green, Live Rich was the book that left me feeling most hopeful, precisely because Bach socks you in the wallet. I learned a lot about just how much -- in dollars and cents -- I could do for me while doing something good for everyone.

"Consider this," Bach says. "Perhaps, after you read this book, you will decide to try just four tips: #3, 12, 26, and 37." These are improving your car's fuel economy (saves $884 a year), lowering (or raising, depending on the season) your thermostat three degrees ($114), making your own nontoxic cleaning products ($580), and bringing your lunch to work (which reduces your use of take-out containers and saves $2,250). That's $3,828 saved in one year. Our get-rich guy later shares some investing tips, noting that if you were to invest that sum every year in a green mutual fund, after 30 years you'd have $696,479, assuming an average return of 10 percent a year. (That rate of return may seem far-fetched this year, but averaged over three decades, it's certainly possible.)

Another eye-opening Bach observation: if your household income is $50,000 and you own two cars, one out of every three paychecks is used to pay for them. When you factor in gas, insurance, maintenance, registration, and depreciation, keeping up a car costs $8,580 a year. That's a lot of money saved if you, average American, give up one of your household's two cars. I don't own a car, so I shared this tip with my mother, a recent retiree who would happily ditch her Subaru and ride a horse everywhere if she could. She's just reported back that my stepfather will be leaving his car in the garage in order to "try out the bus."

The beauty of Bach's book is that, by assigning dollar values to everything we consume, we can't help but give some thought to the amount of excess crap that defines our modern lives: cars, bottled water, iPods, iPhones. It's not just about being a do-gooder; it's about money, which, if you subscribe to the financial self-help mantra, has something to do with winning.

So what to make of this pile of books? Will making me more sustainable -- thinner, richer, less inclined to death by suffocation under giant piles of unnecessary stuff -- prove to be a sure path toward planetary sustainability? Or, coming at it from the other side, can adopting environmental values improve my physical fitness and financial security and even make me happier?

Perhaps. In his 2007 book Deep Economy, Bill McKibben cites a jarring, counterintuitive statistic: the wealthiest nations in the world report the lowest overall levels of happiness. The poorest, those with the least stuff, have a different sort of wealth -- rich culture and close communities -- lost to most Americans. By extension, shopping guides may not lead the way to green nirvana (hardly a surprise), but taken in total, my sagging shelves laden with self-help books hold quite a few reasons to believe that we might soon be headed in the right direction. And that makes me a little happier. Slightly improved, even.

 

OUR REVIEWER'S TOP PICKS:

Ready, Set, Green

Graham Hill and Meaghan O’Neill

Villard, 224 pp., $15

Go Green, Live Rich

David Bach, with Hillary Rosner

Random House, 181 pp., $14.95

 EDITOR'S NOTE: The original version of this article omitted Hillary Rosner from the author credit for Go Green, Live Rich. We regret the error.

Pages: 1 | 2

Comments

  • Oliver Deex wrote on June 03, 2008, 10:10AM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    It is frequently said out here in the hinterlands of western Massachusetts that people in Washington have no idea of how the rest of the country lives. Laura Wright's column in the Summer 2008 issue of "onearth" proves that the disconnect is not just with Congress, the President, and the Supreme Court.

    In her "Green Me" review Ms. Wright states: "So I checked the little number printed inside the recycling symbol: the base is made of plastic #5. Not even in my office, in the headquarters of one of the largest environmental advocacy groups on the planet, are you able to recycle #5."

    Number 5, as it states under the little triangle, is PP or polypropylene, a most versatile plastic used to package medicines and food among other things. It is one of the least toxic plastics around and food containers can be washed in the dishwasher and reused. Here in the wilds of Massachusetts, our town actually collects it (along with other recyclable plastics) every other week. The town even supplies free containers for its residents to use for the recyclables. Also, when the town decided to charge extra for people with more than 20 gallons of trash per week, the amount of paper and plastic recyclables rose substantially.

    I suggest, therefore, that "the headquarters of one of the largest environmental advocacy groups on the planet" hold a seminar for its employees and apprise them of some of the green actions that are going on out here in the wilderness.

    While I have your attention, I might also suggest that you work to improve the B- rating you get from AIP (American Institute of Philanthropy, www.charitywatch.org). I normally do not like to give to organizations with a rating lower than A- but you do accomplish things than no other organization does so I keep you on my list.

    Oliver Deex
    Longmeadow, MA 01106
    odeex@gis.net

  • Justine Burt wrote on June 09, 2008, 09:03PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    Thank you for sorting through all the "How To Go Green" offerings and giving us your recommendations. I found the David Bach summary particularly helpful - saving money by going green. Bach makes a compelling case that a few environmental benefits here and there adds up to a large savings later.

    Sustainability colleagues agonize over the possibility that "green" is just a fad right now and the public's attention will soon turn elsewhere. It won't be a fad as long as there is some direct utility to people by living their lives in a greener way: save money, improved health for family and enhanced happiness overall.

  • Laura Wright wrote on June 12, 2008, 03:53PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    Thanks for your comment, Oliver. Perhaps I should have been clearer in describing the reason why I wasn't able to recycle #5 plastic in our office: New York City will not accept it. You can read why that is here:

    http://www.nyc.gov/html/nycwasteless/html/waste_faq/waste_faq.shtml#plas...

    I sort every bit of trash I produce every day, as does every member of OnEarth's staff and the NRDC staff at large. We even compost our food scraps and take turns bringing those scraps to the greenmarket in Union Square where there's a collection booth operated by the Lower East Side Ecology Center.

    Each NRDC office also has an eco-committee that educates NRDC employees on proper recycling practices and conducts annual audits to make sure employees both understand and are following office recycling rules. Recently the New York eco-committee brought in a representative from the Lower East Side Ecology Center to teach employees how to set up worm composting boxes at home. So you see we do practice what we preach, and the point I was making is that the publisher who produced that eco-calendar should have realized that #5 plastic cannot be recycled in many municipalities and was therefore a poor choice for an eco-themed product. Yes, #5 can be reused, if it's in a reusable form (a plastic calendar holder can not be reused for anything I can think of), can be recycled into new products, but only if you live in a place that collects it! New York City is not one of those places.

View All 4 Comments

Comment on this article


Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | About OnEarth | All Authors | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Media Kit | Contact the Editors | NRDC Home

NRDC