Loving the West to Death

by David Gessner

Click for full-size image Photograph for OnEarth by Grant Delin. Imaging by catchlightdigital.com

(Page 2 of 5)

FAT TIRES IN EDEN 

For my money the drive west from Grand Junction, dropping down out of Colorado into Utah, is the most beautiful in the world. You descend into a strange red dreamworld of hoodoos and mesas and buttes, a landscape of twisted sandstone of such mystic power that even multiple SUV commercials can't desecrate it. As you drop off the highway and head south along Route 128, driving through canyons along the twisting Colorado River with barely another car in sight, it's hard to build up too much ire about how tourists are over-running the West. It becomes less hard 40 miles later when you finally pass the spanking new Sorrel River Ranch resort, a theme park-like cluster of buildings that inhabit a place where I remember unrolling my sleeping bag on a sandbar not too many years back. And it gets plain easy when you enter Moab itself.

Here is where the battle between the new and old West truly rages. RVs rumble down the streets and a hundred gaudy signs try to draw in the tourists, selling rafting and biking and jeep tours. Think Vegas for outdoorsmen. This is not Grand Junction, a city struggling to break free of boom and bust, but an outpost selling whatever adventurous wares it can. Here Power's amenities economy runs wild, with little regard for "appropriate scale."

Moab boomed with the discovery of uranium in the 1950s, briefly reaching a population of 9,000, or almost twice the number who live here today. When uranium prices dove with the shift away from nuclear energy and the end of the cold war, the town floundered. Unemployment skyrocketed, and people left in droves. But Moab reinvented itself fairly quickly, beginning with early mentions in mountain biking magazines. Then it hosted the area's first fat tire festival in 1986, and the chamber of commerce, realizing the town was on to something, began to advertise it as a recreational mecca.

Today Moab is a center for biking, off-road vehicles, rafting, rock climbing, skydiving, and anything else vaguely adventurous, while playing host to dozens of annual festivals that include the Jeep Jamboree and the Moab MUni Fest ("MUni" being short for mountain unicycling). More than 50 percent of the population work in some part of the service economy, and 80 percent of the town's budget comes from sales tax paid mostly by the 1.5 million visitors a year. Starter homes that sold for $18,000 in the mid-1980s go for $250,000 today, and the majority of the houses built over the last 15 years are either second homes or are owned by nonresidents who rent them to tourists. Meanwhile, Moab had a less-than-thriving per capita income in 2003 of $20,634.

The town is also haunted by a recently departed ghost. Just a week before I arrived, Jim Stiles, editor of the Canyon County Zephyr and professional contrarian, gave up his battle to save the soul of Moab and hightailed it for Australia, a land he must hope will approximate the wildness he once found in Utah. Stiles used the Zephyr for two decades as his bully pulpit, railing against rude Lycra-clad mountain bikers, greedy developers, the "commodification of nature," and the amenities economy itself. He saw the last of these not as "a clean and viable alternative to ranching, mining, and timber" but rather as a new kind of boomtown industry with "bleak and destructive consequences of its own."

I asked the first person I saw about Stiles's departure. The man was delivering coffee on his motor scooter and had lived in Moab since 1991. He said his name was Bob Owen, but everyone around town called him Get-a-Job-Bob. As the owner of the Fresh Moab Coffee Roastery, he was just the sort of person the amenities economy is made up of, coming here because he loved the place and then starting a business. "Stiles was really good at pointing out what was wrong with Moab," he said. "Not so good at ways to fix it. Jim did a bunch of good for this town, but a lot of times he couldn't get out of that old Ed Abbey rant mode."

The reference was to Moab's most famous former resident, the writer Edward Abbey, whose 1968 book, Desert Solitaire, both celebrated the glories of Arches National Park, located about 10 miles from where we stood, and railed against the incursions of what he called "industrial tourism." Arches, which saw about 25,000 annual visitors during Abbey's stint as a park ranger in 1956 and 1957, now has almost a million visitors each year.

In the 1970s, Stiles took the same job as a park ranger at Arches and, smitten with the book and the man, adopted the older writer's cranky but inspiring philosophy as his own. For the last couple of decades Stiles has presented a clearly drawn, if exaggerated, picture of the war between old westerners, who like cows and drilling and resent the federal government limiting access to public lands that they consider "theirs," and new westerners, who fight to preserve the land while driving "hundreds or thousands of miles in gas-consuming vehicles so that they can pedal their bicycles for ten." Though Stiles's insights about the West can be brilliantly incisive, this is a cartoon picture that I'm not entirely comfortable with at the moment, especially after my talk with Rob Bleiberg last night.

My first stop in Moab is one that would drive Stiles to rant. In his mythology, Rim Cyclery is analogous to the apple tree in the Garden of Eden. This is where Bill and Robin Groff opened Moab's first mountain bike shop in 1983, which led, just a few years later, to Moab being anointed the mountain biking capital of the world. The consequences, according to Stiles, were not just a huge influx of tourists and the crushing of fragile cryptobiotic soil, a living crust of lichen, mosses, and algae that protects the desert against erosion, but the snapping up of Moab's real estate and the ignition of a boom that would make land, and property taxes, all but unaffordable to many locals.

These days Moab is somewhat passé as a mountain biking destination, the cyclists having moved on to more remote and unspoiled venues. But as a nod to tradition I decided to rent a bike at Rim and pedal the Slickrock Trail. I was met at the bike shop by an old friend, Dave Smith, who had spent the last few days exploring the canyon lands in his beat-up red VW van with his dog, Baxter. Dave is a tall, thin 47-year-old with the shambling grace of the Dude in The Big Lebowski. Though it was a perfect October day, hot even, we saw only three other cars in the vast lot for the world's most famous mountain biking trail, somewhat putting the lie to alarms about overcrowding.

As we got ready to push off, a man on a motorcycle came riding off the trail. Tamping down my reflexive environmental outrage, I walked over to the guy and shook hands. Further complicating local stereotypes, it turned out he was also a mountain biker, and he told me he had lectured some of his fellow motorcyclists on the lack of courtesy they often show non-motorized riders. He had particular scorn for those off-road vehicle drivers who don't wear helmets and booze it up while trashing the trails, thereby giving the motorized a bad name. We agreed that Slickrock and the nearby trails make sense in the way a city makes sense, clustering population in one area while leaving outlying areas more sparsely populated. "There's plenty of room for everyone," he said. "We've already got 70 miles of route just south of here. No reason to complain."

When I last did this ride I was 11 years younger and 15 pounds lighter, and now I spent less time riding than pushing the bike and staring up at Dave as he ascended another rounded red rock far above me. Jim Stiles argues that mountain biking is somehow an inauthentic experience, due in part to the peacock clothes we wear and our lack of appreciation for our surroundings. But later, toasting with Dave over 3.2 beers in town at Eddie McStiffs, I would recall an afternoon of red rock and views of the green river twisting below, and it would feel plenty authentic.

Continued...

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments

  • expat wrote on December 05, 2008, 12:18PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    As a person who grew up on a ranch near GJ I can say that what has happened to the western slope with the natural gas boom and the development that came along with it is incredibly sad. The western slope of Colorado is one of the least populated and most beautiful places left in the lower 48. I am an environmentalist but I also cannot excuse the green liberal elites who demand their little piece of wilderness and buy up ranch and mountain land to build their western getaways. But if I had to choose between the two, I would take the greenies and recreation people over the gas development any day.

  • consternationist female wrote on December 05, 2008, 03:42PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    I'm a Westerner born and bred, and harbor a respect and fierce love that I inherited from my father for the wild places. I've been a dedicated environmentalist since I was very young. Thirty-five years ago I was privileged to help found an important environmental organization, the Idaho Conservation League; and spent many active years helping it to grow, to educate others about our natural heritage and to fight for protective legislation.
    My somewhat purist beliefs are now archaic, it seems, though I continue to hold them and am so reluctant to compromise. Nonetheless, at almost 69 years of age, I am forced to acknowledge the truth in Gessner's article: there are no easy, sharply-defined answers to the dilemma of preserving ("locking it up", if you will) the environment or loving it to death. There will always be those selfish persons who don't care about their impact, unfortunately. But we can't give up. Education on these issues still seems to me to be the key towards protecting what we love.
    I physically no longer can backpack for two weeks at a time in Idaho's central wilderness mountains, even with a successful artificial hip implant. But I can continue to be a responsible steward. I can still enjoy day hikes in our mountains and carefully poke amongst the tidepools in my now-home town by the ocean, and attempt to have as little impact as possible wherever I go. I can recycle and compost and pick up others' trash. I can volunteer with local organizations who build greenway trails that channel would-be nature lovers, and with those who run environmental research/education centers. I can work with the children in the schools to help their new selves see and understand and appreciate the value of (and ultimately care for) these wild places that still thrill my heart - I want my beloved places there for my grandchildren to learn to love.
    It seems I've become a realist rather than an idealist. In this transformation (of myself and hopefully of others) lies one modest answer to preserving the intrinsic necessity resident in our lovely lands, in nourishing our human spirit. This is now my legacy.

  • Tom Holub wrote on December 13, 2008, 04:50PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    I was struck by the image on the magazine cover; Moab is one of my favorite places on the planet. I was further amused to see the reference in the article to the Moab MUniFest, for that is the event that first drew me to the area, back in 2003. I've returned every year since.

    The challenges faced in the West are similar to those faced by eco-tourist areas everywhere; eco-tourism itself has an impact, but often the alternatives involve more onerous and impactful development; slash-and-burn farming, resource depletion, cattle grazing. Clearly a balance must be struck. Moab continues to draw me, and dozens of my friends, to appreciate the natural beauty of the area, support the local economy, and, yes, ride on trails and occasionally disturb the soil or plants. Any use has an effect, even though our group has a strong environmental conscience. But if there were no tourists to appreciate the place, who would protect it from drilling, strip mining and worse?

    The one issue I have with the article is the implied equation of non-motorized adventure sports (mountain biking/unicycling, hiking or rafting) with motorized off-road sports. The environmental impacts of mountain biking are essentially nil compared to the impacts of Hummer tours, so those activities should be considered distinct when considering the potential uses of public land.

    The article suggests that public use of these lands is increasing, but the reality is that attendance is down at nearly all of our national parks. It may be the case that demographic and cultural shifts are bringing people to places like the Slickrock Trail and other BLM lands more than to Arches or Canyonlands. Our current concept of wilderness and parkland, partly inspired by Stegner, has created a situation where the parks are viewed as places for serious, almost academic study, rather than places to experience and enjoy the outdoors. One thing is sure; if those who manage our wild lands fail to find a way to connect with the younger generations who are charged with the future stewardship of those lands, at some point there will be no one left to speak for the land.

    I'll be back in Moab in March: riding the trails, appreciating the breathtaking beauty, and, to the extent that it is possible, leaving no trace. And I'll continue to speak for the land.

View All 8 Comments

Comment on this article


Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | About OnEarth | All Authors | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Media Kit | Contact the Editors | NRDC Home

NRDC