Loving the West to Death

by David Gessner

Click for full-size image Photograph for OnEarth by Grant Delin. Imaging by catchlightdigital.com

(Page 3 of 5)

THE COMPLICATED COWBOY

"Ed Abbey was a hypocrite," said the caretaker at Pack Creek Ranch.  "His book brought more people to Moab than all the ads by the chamber of commerce."

It's the old nature writing irony: Walden sending an army of Thoreau wannabes to the woods. And I couldn't help but nod, since I'd never have come to Moab in the first place if I hadn't read Desert Solitaire when I was 28.

I spent my second night in the West at Pack Creek, high above the town, perched amid the aspens and pines of the La Sal Mountains and looking down at the multiple red rock towers, which resemble a series of giant, misplaced chess pieces. The ranch is partly owned by Ken Sleight, a 79-year-old former river rafter and horseman. Sleight was the inspiration for Seldom Seen Smith, the wildly adventurous part-time Mormon who appeared in Abbey's best-known novel, The Monkey Wrench Gang.

The next morning I found Sleight over by his truck in front of his house. He was wearing jeans and two dungaree shirts, despite the early heat. We walked up to talk in his "office" -- an aluminum-roofed bunker above the horse pasture. He sat down, stretched out his legs, and told me stories about his early days as one of Utah's original river guides.

I confessed that I'd spent the day before mountain biking, and asked him what he made of the biking craze.

"Well, I don't think they hurt the land that much," he said. "Mostly what they hurt is the spirit of the wilderness. I'll be out taking a hike and they'll come roaring down. Never one of them, of course. They run in packs in those colorful clothes. Anytime you bring fashion into wilderness I think you're in trouble. I'd like to get on my horse and ride down into town all clad in Spandex. Just to show them how ridiculous they look."

Sleight has evolved over the years into one of his region's most outspoken voices for the environment. He has watched over the decades as Moab cycled through booms and busts, and he watches now as thousands of small uranium claims are made on public lands, including the hundreds that are right next to Arches, where his old friend was a ranger. About a decade ago he discovered that loggers were deforesting the nearby Amassa Back Wilderness, dragging chained trees over Native American archaeological sites. What further outraged him was that this was going on without the required BLM monitor. So he climbed on his horse and rode up the mountain to confront the loggers.

"I pulled up in front of them so that they had to either stop or run me over," he said. "My horse bucked when they kept coming. But they finally stopped. We had a standoff until the cops came. I was hoping they would arrest me but they didn't. You can say it was just a symbol, but the next time they logged they had a BLM man with them."

Despite these bursts of civil disobedience, Sleight has spent the better part of his life in the tourism business and confessed some culpability in Moab's recreation boom. "When I went down the river with Abbey, we were both kind of like double agents," he said. "We both loved it all -- the goofing off, the joy of the campfire, the feeling that everything was right in the realm. But at the same time we had our uses for the thing. He was always writing and thinking about the places and people we were with. He was doing it with his writing, and I was doing it with the trips. 'Come with me and I'll show you Cathedral in the Desert.'

"I remember when I was living down in Escalante, taking trips down Escalante Canyon to Coyote Gulch," Sleight continued. "When I first went there the place was empty, and I would put out these little mimeographed sheets in town, trying to drum up business. But then I took a reporter from Sunset magazine down the river and he wrote an article on me. A few weeks later I saw people hiking in the canyon, and when I asked them they said yes, they had read the article. And people led to more people. I began to see you had to be careful. Began to see you could love a place to death."

Sleight admitted he had had his hand in how things ended up. But he had also tried to slow them down, fighting to regulate and keep new roads and developments out of Moab. In fact, despite his cowboy image, many of his battles over the last four decades have been efforts at restraint.

"I've become a firm believer in limiting the number of rafters per canyon," Sleight said. "But that gets into regulation. And then you start to lose a feeling of wilderness spirit and freedom."

This, I thought, is the crux of it, the reason so many are resistant to restraint, to regulating and policing our public lands. "Lawlessness, like wildness, is attractive, and we conceive the last remaining home of both to be the West," wrote Stegner. Yes, we come West for that feeling of wildness, of lawlessness, the sense that we can do what we want and do it on our own. But in these days of crushing numbers, one person's freedom has an impact on the freedom of a hundred others. Take the roaring freedom of off-road vehicles, which, while making up only 7 percent of the Moab area's recreators, have access to 81 percent of BLM land. It's true those who stay on the existing roads do minimal damage, but since freedom and exploration are central to the activity's appeal, it's common to head off-trail and splash down riverbeds. As for sheriffing the motorized drivers, or the bikers and hikers for that matter, at the moment there are two BLM law enforcement officers in the Moab office in charge of overseeing the area's 1.82 million acres and one officer overseeing another 1.79 million acres to the south.

"Mining and drilling are the biggest environmental issues in northern Utah," says Liz Thomas of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance. Bobby McEnaney, an expert on public lands at the Natural Resources Defense Council, which works closely with the alliance, says that the Bush administration's last-minute plan to sell off a new round of oil and gas leases in Utah -- including some on land that abuts Arches National Park -- is particularly disturbing. McEnaney says, "These leases are in areas where the BLM had identified much of the land as being of wilderness caliber, but of course as soon as any drilling equipment or roads are introduced, wilderness designation goes out the window."

In southern Utah the threat is different. "Here," says Thomas, "off-highway vehicles are the biggest issue, hands down. Right now there are 20,000 miles of route in southern and eastern Utah. If you look at a BLM map, it looks like a bloodshot eye."

Ranchers and other old westerners, and now off-road vehicle drivers, have long resented the government telling them what they can or can't do on public land. But with greater numbers and greater use, it may just be that championing regulation and restraint, while not quite as sexy as championing freedom, is the key to preserving the smaller freedoms that are left. Conversely, allow for unregulated freedom and you end up with Moab, or worse.

Continued...

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments

  • expat wrote on December 05, 2008, 12:18PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    As a person who grew up on a ranch near GJ I can say that what has happened to the western slope with the natural gas boom and the development that came along with it is incredibly sad. The western slope of Colorado is one of the least populated and most beautiful places left in the lower 48. I am an environmentalist but I also cannot excuse the green liberal elites who demand their little piece of wilderness and buy up ranch and mountain land to build their western getaways. But if I had to choose between the two, I would take the greenies and recreation people over the gas development any day.

  • consternationist female wrote on December 05, 2008, 03:42PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    I'm a Westerner born and bred, and harbor a respect and fierce love that I inherited from my father for the wild places. I've been a dedicated environmentalist since I was very young. Thirty-five years ago I was privileged to help found an important environmental organization, the Idaho Conservation League; and spent many active years helping it to grow, to educate others about our natural heritage and to fight for protective legislation.
    My somewhat purist beliefs are now archaic, it seems, though I continue to hold them and am so reluctant to compromise. Nonetheless, at almost 69 years of age, I am forced to acknowledge the truth in Gessner's article: there are no easy, sharply-defined answers to the dilemma of preserving ("locking it up", if you will) the environment or loving it to death. There will always be those selfish persons who don't care about their impact, unfortunately. But we can't give up. Education on these issues still seems to me to be the key towards protecting what we love.
    I physically no longer can backpack for two weeks at a time in Idaho's central wilderness mountains, even with a successful artificial hip implant. But I can continue to be a responsible steward. I can still enjoy day hikes in our mountains and carefully poke amongst the tidepools in my now-home town by the ocean, and attempt to have as little impact as possible wherever I go. I can recycle and compost and pick up others' trash. I can volunteer with local organizations who build greenway trails that channel would-be nature lovers, and with those who run environmental research/education centers. I can work with the children in the schools to help their new selves see and understand and appreciate the value of (and ultimately care for) these wild places that still thrill my heart - I want my beloved places there for my grandchildren to learn to love.
    It seems I've become a realist rather than an idealist. In this transformation (of myself and hopefully of others) lies one modest answer to preserving the intrinsic necessity resident in our lovely lands, in nourishing our human spirit. This is now my legacy.

  • Tom Holub wrote on December 13, 2008, 04:50PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    I was struck by the image on the magazine cover; Moab is one of my favorite places on the planet. I was further amused to see the reference in the article to the Moab MUniFest, for that is the event that first drew me to the area, back in 2003. I've returned every year since.

    The challenges faced in the West are similar to those faced by eco-tourist areas everywhere; eco-tourism itself has an impact, but often the alternatives involve more onerous and impactful development; slash-and-burn farming, resource depletion, cattle grazing. Clearly a balance must be struck. Moab continues to draw me, and dozens of my friends, to appreciate the natural beauty of the area, support the local economy, and, yes, ride on trails and occasionally disturb the soil or plants. Any use has an effect, even though our group has a strong environmental conscience. But if there were no tourists to appreciate the place, who would protect it from drilling, strip mining and worse?

    The one issue I have with the article is the implied equation of non-motorized adventure sports (mountain biking/unicycling, hiking or rafting) with motorized off-road sports. The environmental impacts of mountain biking are essentially nil compared to the impacts of Hummer tours, so those activities should be considered distinct when considering the potential uses of public land.

    The article suggests that public use of these lands is increasing, but the reality is that attendance is down at nearly all of our national parks. It may be the case that demographic and cultural shifts are bringing people to places like the Slickrock Trail and other BLM lands more than to Arches or Canyonlands. Our current concept of wilderness and parkland, partly inspired by Stegner, has created a situation where the parks are viewed as places for serious, almost academic study, rather than places to experience and enjoy the outdoors. One thing is sure; if those who manage our wild lands fail to find a way to connect with the younger generations who are charged with the future stewardship of those lands, at some point there will be no one left to speak for the land.

    I'll be back in Moab in March: riding the trails, appreciating the breathtaking beauty, and, to the extent that it is possible, leaving no trace. And I'll continue to speak for the land.

View All 8 Comments

Comment on this article


Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | About OnEarth | All Authors | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Media Kit | Contact the Editors | NRDC Home

NRDC