Transylvania: Welcome to the Future

by Bruce Stutz

Photo of Roma, or Gypsy, families in the village of Mensha Click for full-size image Roma, or Gypsy, families in the village of Mensha formed a herding cooperative to help gain an economic foothold. Antonin Kratochvil

A dictator wanted to raze it with bulldozers. Investors wanted to turn it into a theme park called Draculaland. In a forgotten pocket of Central Europe, villagers struggle to preserve a way of life that leaves only the lightest of footprints on the land.

The steeply rolling hills of the Transylvanian plateau lie within the gnarled grasp of the Carpathian Mountains, which curve down through Central Europe into the heart of Romania. Although the Carpathians' highest peaks rise only some 8,000 feet, rugged, irregular ridges, difficult to traverse, have always isolated the plateau from the capital city of Bucharest and the sprawling Danube-Black Sea delta to the south. Transylvania did not become a part of Romania until 1918. Even today, only a few roads cross the mountains, and the one I was on coiled in ever-tighter switchbacks as it wound through the cold, deep forest. I accepted the rigors of the passage, however, partly because my car had four-wheel drive, but mostly because I had been promised that through the woods (which is the literal meaning of Transylvania) I would have a glimpse of a lost world.

"In Transylvania you will see a preindustrial, self-sufficient agricultural system," Jessica Douglas-Home, the slim, soft-spoken founder and chairwoman of the Mihai Eminescu Trust, assured me when I visited her London office. Since 1997, the trust, partnering at times with the United Nations Development Program, the World Bank, and the European Union (E.U.), has worked to restore and maintain the region's ancient villages, homes, churches, and, especially, agricultural traditions.

The region, Douglas-Home told me, is the very model of an integrated, sustainable world that consumes only what it can replenish, that treads lightly on its environment and leaves barely a carbon footprint behind. "When fuel shortages begin to make things bad for the rest of us," she said, "Transylvania will hardly have to cough."

With its small common grazing meadows and forested hilltops, this preindustrial landscape also holds great reserves of biodiversity, where rare wildflowers, insects, birds, reptiles, and amphibians thrive. According to the E.U., some two-thirds of Europe's threatened and endangered bird species are found on such lands. In fact, it was the very lack of efficiency and expansion-hand threshing, communal grazing, home processing-that shaped these ecosystems and ensured their survival. In Transylvania, a local biologist told me, it is nearly impossible to separate the landscape from the culture.

The creators of Transylvania's lost world were known as Saxons, descendants of settlers from northern Europe: Germanic and Franconian miners, tradesmen, farmers, and knights who migrated to the region in the twelfth century. (Legend has it that their forebears were the children the Pied Piper led out of Hamelin.) Granted near-autonomy over the region by King Geza II of Hungary -- Transylvania was then, as it would be time and again, part of the Hungarian empire -- the Saxons lived in small villages huddled along valley streams. Each household had a horse, a pig, a cow or two, and a garden. All shared the common grazing lands. Ensconced in these river valley refuges, the Saxons retained their Luxembourgish dialect (more Old German than modern), upheld their Reformation religious zeal, preserved their distinctive architecture, and managed to remain apart from the misrule that characterized Balkan geopolitics.

The effort to preserve these Saxon lands has become all the more urgent since Romania's accession to the European Union in January 2007. E.U. regulations designed to standardize and modernize farming methods, milking and dairy production, as well as the breeding, grazing, transport, and slaughter of cattle, have created difficulties for small farmers throughout the E.U., but especially in countries such as Romania, Bulgaria, and Poland, where subsistence farms number in the millions. For many of these farmers, membership in the union is proving to be, as one writer put it, a "Trojan pig," a once welcome gift that has released market forces that could decimate the region's small, sustainable economies.

If, as Douglas-Home believes, these farmers are the last, best hope for preserving "a way of life which produces food as a culture rather than a business," it has become evident that time, and the tide of globalization, are running against them.

"Although Romania has fertile agricultural land, vast tracts of forest, and a rich network of rivers," World Bank analysts wrote in a 2006 report, "its rural areas suffer from inadequate infrastructure and inefficient agricultural production." The average size of a farm in Romania is 7.5 acres, and two-thirds of the country's farms are smaller than five acres. The average size of an E.U. farm, by comparison, is 47 acres. But the larger problem, the World Bank said, is that Romania's farms have extremely low yields in crops, livestock, and, especially, milk production, on which most farm families rely for at least half their income.

Continued...

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments

  • A K Gary wrote on March 06, 2008, 12:14PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    A wonderful article clearly highlights the risks posed by EU membership to villager ways of life here.
    Transylvania is and has been rich in ethno-diversity, as well as the bio-diversity discussed here. The people just 20 miles away from Crit in the Gagy Valley villages where I have visited several times are in most part Hungarian speaking. Hungarian, Saxon, Roma and Romanian peoples in the villages through the region all share the challenge to their ways of life. And the villagers further up in the valleys are quickly isolated by their rutted dirt roads, so the option of "developing non-farm activities" as suggested by the World Bank rep, which are mostly city related, are not really an option.

  • Doru Lucian Iliesiu wrote on May 14, 2008, 11:10PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    I was born and raised in northern Transylvania, and defected from communist Romania in 1969 as a student in architecture. My background is a mixture of Romanian, Hungarian, and Austrian. English people and their Internet sites usually maintain the tradition of being fair, but your article expresses a very limited and biased perspective about Transylvania, it has several essential omissions, and it includes misleading statements that I considered offensive:

    (1) You do not mention at all that the largest-by-far majority of its population is Romanian, and it has a Latin background as the name of this region indicates (“Transsilvania” in Latin, meaning as you write: “through the woods”); the capital of the Dacians, initially a Thracian tribe before becoming part of the Roman Empire, was in the south-west of Transylvania, not very far from the area you are describing; therefore, “The creators of Transylvania's lost world were...” first the Romanians, not the Saxons;

    (2) The site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romania includes the following phrase: “In 2002, the oldest modern human (Homo sapiens) remains in Europe were discovered in the "Cave With Bones" (Peşstera cu Oase) near Anina in present day Romania.[15] The remains (the lower jaw) are approximately 42,000 years old and have been nicknamed "John of Anina" (Ion din Anina).” This Cave is located within the Carpathian Mountains south-west of the Dacians’ capital-city ruins.

    (3) The Saxons did not migrate “to the region in the twelfth century” but were colonized as mercenaries at that time by the Hungarians/Magyars in the southern part of Transylvania, after they conquered its several city-states during the 10th and 11th centuries, in order to protect militarily the passages through the Carpathian Mountains from the Romanian-speaking people of the southern planes that became the principality of Wallachia around 1310;

    (4) The site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transylvania includes the following phrases: “In its early history, the territory of Transylvania belonged to a variety of Empires and States, including Dacia, the Roman Empire, ... As a political entity, (Southern) Transylvania is mentioned from the 12th century as a county (Alba) of the Kingdom of Hungary . ... It then became an autonomous principality under nominal Ottoman suzerainty in 1571. A few centuries later, in 1688, it was added to the expanding territories of Habsburg Monarchy, then became again a part of the Kingdom of Hungary within the newly established Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1867. Since World War I, it has been part of Romania, apart from a brief period of Hungarian occupation during World War II.”

    (5) It is correct that “Transylvania did not become a part of Romania until 1918,” but you omit to mention when Romania was formed; again the site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romania specifies: “The electors in both Moldavia and Wallachia chose in 1859 the same person – ... – as prince ....[55] Thus, Romania was created as a personal union, albeit a Romania that did not include Transylvania, where the upper class and the aristocracy remained mainly Hungarian, although Romanian nationalism inevitably ran up against Hungarian nationalism at the end of the 19th century.“

    (6) The way you present Transylvania’s history appears to be a subtle case for presenting again and endorsing Hungary’s claim to Transylvania.

    (7) It is incorrect to generalize that "In Transylvania you will see a preindustrial, self-sufficient agricultural system." Certainly there are many areas as you describe, but it is demeaning to present the whole Transylvania as such.

    D. Lucian Iliesiu, Architect, New York, NY

  • Iulian wrote on June 24, 2008, 10:01AM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    @ Mr. Lucian Iliescu
    your internet sources are wrong. Wikipedia is not a citable source for everything.

Comment on this article


Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | About OnEarth | All Authors | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Media Kit | Contact the Editors | NRDC Home

NRDC