Transylvania: Welcome to the Future

by Bruce Stutz

Photo of Roma, or Gypsy, families in the village of Mensha Click for full-size image Roma, or Gypsy, families in the village of Mensha formed a herding cooperative to help gain an economic foothold. Antonin Kratochvil

(Page 2 of 5)

"These farms need to be integrated into vertical supply chains," the report stated. "Efficiency can be increased only by adopting policies that facilitate the structural reorganization of agriculture by allowing inefficient farms to close down . . . and removing obstacles to the expansion of new and more efficient farming units."

Just beyond a crooked wooden marker that read "Crit," I turned from the main road onto a gravel lane that led to the village's only thoroughfare, a dusty clay street with neither a car nor a soul in sight. The one- and two-story hip-roofed houses on either side of the road had connecting lime-washed facades, some fading white, a few recently painted in pale blue and pastel orange. The houses were set back some 20 feet, separated from the road by a continuous swath of green lawn rife with dandelions. A knee-deep drainage swale ran along each side of the road, bridged at intervals by wood plank crossings that marked the entryways to the houses. Most of the windows were shuttered. An untethered horse grazed. Geese with goslings scurried up and down the swales. Hens and roosters strutted about. The sun setting behind the green-pastured hills cast an amber glow over the entire scene.

Then I heard what sounded like a firecracker, and then another, and soon a lumbering procession of cows came into view, accompanied by roughly dressed young herders snapping long switches in the air. From another direction came a small herd of goats, scampering and baying. A horse-drawn cart carrying herders seated among the hay bales in the back came cantering through. In 20 minutes rush hour had passed, the dust had settled, and quiet returned with the twilight.

It seemed not only a lost world but also an abandoned one.

The next day I met Caroline Fernolend, a town councilor in Viscri, and together we drove the three miles from Crit along a narrow, rutted dirt road to her picturesque village, its layout nearly identical to Crit's. Diminutive, dark-haired, blue-eyed, and voluble, she confirmed that no one lives in many of the homes in Viscri, Crit, or the 15 other Saxon villages whose restoration she, as Romanian director of the Eminescu Trust, is charged with overseeing.

World War II and the subsequent establishment of the Socialist Republic of Romania altered the Saxons' fortunes. Some were deported to the Soviet Union to assist in its postwar rebuilding; others were labeled Hitlerists and deprived of their political rights; others lost their land to "agricultural reform." Many sought to leave. Between 1979 and 1988, the West German government paid the government of Nicolai Ceausescu hundreds of millions of dollars in exchange for allowing up to 13,000 ethnic Germans a year to emigrate. As the Saxons left, Ceausescu began resettling the region with Romanians and Roma, or Gypsies. Later he conceived a grand "systemization" plan, under which Saxon villages such as Viscri would be bulldozed into oblivion, but his ouster and execution in 1989 put an end to that.

In 1990, with Ceausescu and the Berlin Wall both gone, the Saxon exodus began in earnest. Today Viscri has a population of some 450 souls, and only 26 of them are of Saxon descent. Five of those are members of Fernolend's immediate family.

In an effort to preserve sustainable farming and restore the village economies, Fernolend, along with the Eminescu Trust, has been promoting agrotourism. (During our time together I heard her converse with tour operators in Romanian, English, German, and French.) Tourists stay in restored homes, and a few families in the villages have refined their cooking and hospitality enough to host the visitors for meals prepared with local meats and agricultural products. While her efforts have begun to show results, she admitted that only so many projects can be supported. And increased tourism has done little to allay her larger concerns about the E.U. and its regulations.

Last Easter, Fernolend told me, herders found out they could no longer bring their lambs to market without a livestock transport license. Since most couldn't afford a license, they had to sell their lambs to someone who could, getting a lower price than the lambs would have fetched in the market.

"Soon our cows won't be allowed in the streets," she said. "What is now common land will have to be fenced. Animals will have to be milked by machine, but you need 10 cows to make a milk machine worthwhile. Most of these farmers have only two. They won't be able to sell their milk. Processing dairy products will require an expensive installation that one person can't afford."

Continued...

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments

  • A K Gary wrote on March 06, 2008, 12:14PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    A wonderful article clearly highlights the risks posed by EU membership to villager ways of life here.
    Transylvania is and has been rich in ethno-diversity, as well as the bio-diversity discussed here. The people just 20 miles away from Crit in the Gagy Valley villages where I have visited several times are in most part Hungarian speaking. Hungarian, Saxon, Roma and Romanian peoples in the villages through the region all share the challenge to their ways of life. And the villagers further up in the valleys are quickly isolated by their rutted dirt roads, so the option of "developing non-farm activities" as suggested by the World Bank rep, which are mostly city related, are not really an option.

  • Doru Lucian Iliesiu wrote on May 14, 2008, 11:10PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    I was born and raised in northern Transylvania, and defected from communist Romania in 1969 as a student in architecture. My background is a mixture of Romanian, Hungarian, and Austrian. English people and their Internet sites usually maintain the tradition of being fair, but your article expresses a very limited and biased perspective about Transylvania, it has several essential omissions, and it includes misleading statements that I considered offensive:

    (1) You do not mention at all that the largest-by-far majority of its population is Romanian, and it has a Latin background as the name of this region indicates (“Transsilvania” in Latin, meaning as you write: “through the woods”); the capital of the Dacians, initially a Thracian tribe before becoming part of the Roman Empire, was in the south-west of Transylvania, not very far from the area you are describing; therefore, “The creators of Transylvania's lost world were...” first the Romanians, not the Saxons;

    (2) The site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romania includes the following phrase: “In 2002, the oldest modern human (Homo sapiens) remains in Europe were discovered in the "Cave With Bones" (Peşstera cu Oase) near Anina in present day Romania.[15] The remains (the lower jaw) are approximately 42,000 years old and have been nicknamed "John of Anina" (Ion din Anina).” This Cave is located within the Carpathian Mountains south-west of the Dacians’ capital-city ruins.

    (3) The Saxons did not migrate “to the region in the twelfth century” but were colonized as mercenaries at that time by the Hungarians/Magyars in the southern part of Transylvania, after they conquered its several city-states during the 10th and 11th centuries, in order to protect militarily the passages through the Carpathian Mountains from the Romanian-speaking people of the southern planes that became the principality of Wallachia around 1310;

    (4) The site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transylvania includes the following phrases: “In its early history, the territory of Transylvania belonged to a variety of Empires and States, including Dacia, the Roman Empire, ... As a political entity, (Southern) Transylvania is mentioned from the 12th century as a county (Alba) of the Kingdom of Hungary . ... It then became an autonomous principality under nominal Ottoman suzerainty in 1571. A few centuries later, in 1688, it was added to the expanding territories of Habsburg Monarchy, then became again a part of the Kingdom of Hungary within the newly established Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1867. Since World War I, it has been part of Romania, apart from a brief period of Hungarian occupation during World War II.”

    (5) It is correct that “Transylvania did not become a part of Romania until 1918,” but you omit to mention when Romania was formed; again the site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romania specifies: “The electors in both Moldavia and Wallachia chose in 1859 the same person – ... – as prince ....[55] Thus, Romania was created as a personal union, albeit a Romania that did not include Transylvania, where the upper class and the aristocracy remained mainly Hungarian, although Romanian nationalism inevitably ran up against Hungarian nationalism at the end of the 19th century.“

    (6) The way you present Transylvania’s history appears to be a subtle case for presenting again and endorsing Hungary’s claim to Transylvania.

    (7) It is incorrect to generalize that "In Transylvania you will see a preindustrial, self-sufficient agricultural system." Certainly there are many areas as you describe, but it is demeaning to present the whole Transylvania as such.

    D. Lucian Iliesiu, Architect, New York, NY

  • Iulian wrote on June 24, 2008, 10:01AM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    @ Mr. Lucian Iliescu
    your internet sources are wrong. Wikipedia is not a citable source for everything.

Comment on this article


Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | About OnEarth | All Authors | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Media Kit | Contact the Editors | NRDC Home

NRDC