Transylvania: Welcome to the Future

by Bruce Stutz

Photo of Roma, or Gypsy, families in the village of Mensha Click for full-size image Roma, or Gypsy, families in the village of Mensha formed a herding cooperative to help gain an economic foothold. Antonin Kratochvil

(Page 3 of 5)

As we walked through a haze of windblown white blossoms from the pear trees that line both sides of Viscri's broad main road, Fernolend explained how the legacy of Communist-era collective farms -- she served as economist/accountant for the local collective -- continues to have its effects. The farmers once again resent having their lives ruled by government regulations, and they remain suspicious of any effort that bears a resemblance to collectivized farming.

"Now we can think and say and do what we believe in, but Communism destroyed our trust in ourselves," she said. "When a Swiss guy offered to create a milk collective, people said, 'If my cow is better, why should I get the same price for my milk as everyone else?' But unless we cooperate, the E.U. regulations will destroy us.

"We are," she allowed, "between states of mind."

No one expressed those dual states of mind better than Rolf Roth, whom I visited in the village of Malancrav.

Roth is a huge man with intense brown eyes, a fullback's neck, and large, thick hands. His frame, even in his stocking feet, nearly filled the doorway to his house. In the barn abutting the house, pigs and piglets snorted and squealed in the mud and compost of their pen, pushing their snouts through the wire enclosure. Roth's wife, Dana, had just brought out some white cheese, airy as meringue, that she'd made at home with milk from the family's herd of 20 cows -- a large herd, by village standards, that enabled the Roths to sell cheese and milk as well as provide for themselves.

The E.U. regulations will soon make his life more difficult, Roth complained. And all of this is happening, he said, at a time when Romania needs to fund and promote its own dairy producers. "Romania does not produce enough milk to cover the necessities of Romania," he told me. "In Romania, in this land with all its milk, in this village children go without milk. Families can't afford to buy it."

While milk imported from other countries in the European Union might bring down the price, without government support, small-scale local farmers such as Roth will not survive. "And will we be able to compete with the cheeses brought in from abroad?" he asked.

But what, I asked him, about continuing to produce the way he always has, marketing his products locally and promoting them, as the Eminescu Trust and other nongovernmental organizations are trying to do, as traditional and organic agricultural products?

"Traditional agriculture? I don't know what that means," Roth said. "[These groups] will provide assistance for farmers who use traditional methods? But that itself becomes extra time and work, and we won't be able to compete on the market."

He pointed out that the regulations would still demand that his wife's cheeses meet new pasteurization and sanitary standards, which would mean purchasing licenses and equipment, and that all products be refrigerated when stored or transported. All expenses in time and money that he can't afford. "We're not ready for this," he told me. "For tourists it's nice to ride through green valleys. It's nostalgic. But not for locals who have a pig and a cow and have to survive on what they can produce on half a hectare [a little over an acre] per family."

In a written response to an e-mail inquiry, Michael Mann, E.U. spokesman for agriculture and rural development, acknowledged the problem. "Concerns as to the ability of small farms to meet genuine E.U. requirements are not without foundation."

Mann's view is very similar to the World Bank's: there are simply too many small farms for them all to survive. Small farmers "need to develop alternative part-time or even full-time non-farm activities in the area where they live."

To help them through the transition, the E.U. has increased funding to its rural development programs for its newest members. Romania alone will receive more than eight billion euros ($11.7 billion) over the next six years. All of these programs, however, depend upon the national government for implementation. And the Romanian government has had its own difficulties reaching those farmers in need. Raluca Barbu, who oversees the World Wildlife Fund's rural development and conservation efforts in Romania and Bulgaria, told me that only some 50 agricultural advisory offices have been set up to help the more than 1.5 million small farmers in these two countries. Most of the offices, she said, are located in major cities, too far for many of the farmers to travel to.

Mann hopes for the development of "non-farm activities," but that is not what has happened. Many young people simply leave the farms for work in the cities, in Romania and elsewhere in the E.U. Since 1990 the population of Romania has declined by 1.5 million, or 6.5 percent, the combined result of this exodus and a low birth rate. By 2050, the population is expected to decline another 16 percent.

Continued...

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments

  • A K Gary wrote on March 06, 2008, 12:14PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    A wonderful article clearly highlights the risks posed by EU membership to villager ways of life here.
    Transylvania is and has been rich in ethno-diversity, as well as the bio-diversity discussed here. The people just 20 miles away from Crit in the Gagy Valley villages where I have visited several times are in most part Hungarian speaking. Hungarian, Saxon, Roma and Romanian peoples in the villages through the region all share the challenge to their ways of life. And the villagers further up in the valleys are quickly isolated by their rutted dirt roads, so the option of "developing non-farm activities" as suggested by the World Bank rep, which are mostly city related, are not really an option.

  • Doru Lucian Iliesiu wrote on May 14, 2008, 11:10PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    I was born and raised in northern Transylvania, and defected from communist Romania in 1969 as a student in architecture. My background is a mixture of Romanian, Hungarian, and Austrian. English people and their Internet sites usually maintain the tradition of being fair, but your article expresses a very limited and biased perspective about Transylvania, it has several essential omissions, and it includes misleading statements that I considered offensive:

    (1) You do not mention at all that the largest-by-far majority of its population is Romanian, and it has a Latin background as the name of this region indicates (“Transsilvania” in Latin, meaning as you write: “through the woods”); the capital of the Dacians, initially a Thracian tribe before becoming part of the Roman Empire, was in the south-west of Transylvania, not very far from the area you are describing; therefore, “The creators of Transylvania's lost world were...” first the Romanians, not the Saxons;

    (2) The site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romania includes the following phrase: “In 2002, the oldest modern human (Homo sapiens) remains in Europe were discovered in the "Cave With Bones" (Peşstera cu Oase) near Anina in present day Romania.[15] The remains (the lower jaw) are approximately 42,000 years old and have been nicknamed "John of Anina" (Ion din Anina).” This Cave is located within the Carpathian Mountains south-west of the Dacians’ capital-city ruins.

    (3) The Saxons did not migrate “to the region in the twelfth century” but were colonized as mercenaries at that time by the Hungarians/Magyars in the southern part of Transylvania, after they conquered its several city-states during the 10th and 11th centuries, in order to protect militarily the passages through the Carpathian Mountains from the Romanian-speaking people of the southern planes that became the principality of Wallachia around 1310;

    (4) The site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transylvania includes the following phrases: “In its early history, the territory of Transylvania belonged to a variety of Empires and States, including Dacia, the Roman Empire, ... As a political entity, (Southern) Transylvania is mentioned from the 12th century as a county (Alba) of the Kingdom of Hungary . ... It then became an autonomous principality under nominal Ottoman suzerainty in 1571. A few centuries later, in 1688, it was added to the expanding territories of Habsburg Monarchy, then became again a part of the Kingdom of Hungary within the newly established Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1867. Since World War I, it has been part of Romania, apart from a brief period of Hungarian occupation during World War II.”

    (5) It is correct that “Transylvania did not become a part of Romania until 1918,” but you omit to mention when Romania was formed; again the site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romania specifies: “The electors in both Moldavia and Wallachia chose in 1859 the same person – ... – as prince ....[55] Thus, Romania was created as a personal union, albeit a Romania that did not include Transylvania, where the upper class and the aristocracy remained mainly Hungarian, although Romanian nationalism inevitably ran up against Hungarian nationalism at the end of the 19th century.“

    (6) The way you present Transylvania’s history appears to be a subtle case for presenting again and endorsing Hungary’s claim to Transylvania.

    (7) It is incorrect to generalize that "In Transylvania you will see a preindustrial, self-sufficient agricultural system." Certainly there are many areas as you describe, but it is demeaning to present the whole Transylvania as such.

    D. Lucian Iliesiu, Architect, New York, NY

  • Iulian wrote on June 24, 2008, 10:01AM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    @ Mr. Lucian Iliescu
    your internet sources are wrong. Wikipedia is not a citable source for everything.

Comment on this article


Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | About OnEarth | All Authors | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Media Kit | Contact the Editors | NRDC Home

NRDC