Transylvania: Welcome to the Future

by Bruce Stutz

Photo of Roma, or Gypsy, families in the village of Mensha Click for full-size image Roma, or Gypsy, families in the village of Mensha formed a herding cooperative to help gain an economic foothold. Antonin Kratochvil

(Page 4 of 5)

Along with this loss of human capital, Barbu said, the abandonment of grazing meadows and pastures has brought the loss of vital habitats and their biodiversity. (This may seem counterintuitive, but ancient farming methods meant that rare wildflowers, reptiles, and amphibians were able to thrive on this land.) This is happening in areas such as Transylvania and the Carpathians, which the E.U. itself has designated "high nature-value farmland." A 2004 report by the European Environment Agency found that abandonment of small farms was a prime cause of biodiversity decline and that "current policy measures appear insufficient to prevent further decline."

Under E.U. legislation, an umbrella organization called Natura 2000 oversees a large number of natural habitats designated for protection. In Romania, and in Transylvania in particular, this has provided a nascent environmental movement with a mechanism for challenging plans for government and private development.

At the streamside dacha of dentist/naturalist/activist Alex Gota (who served up local ham, cheese, and homemade schnapps), an enthusiastic group of local biologists and conservationists peppered a Natura 2000 official with questions in Romanian and English about how to deal with proposed highways and tourist developments, how to keep foresters from clear-cutting, how to control strip-mining, and how to fund their own projects and research.

Erika Stanciu, the local Natura 2000 director, explained to me afterward just how new this all is. Not only is it a novelty to be able to question development plans, but it is also unprecedented for the government to have its plans questioned.

"The government is overwhelmed by all the changes. It is overwhelmed by this transition. We are all overwhelmed."

Over the next days I did see several projects that  gave me some tenuous hope. In the village of Nemsa, Julius Comisa, a Roma farmer, heads an association of villagers that received 150 goats three years ago from the Center for Research and Ethnic Relations, a Roma organization in Cluj, with the stipulation that the goats not be slaughtered or sold but raised to produce milk and cheese. Since then the association has expanded to include 30 families, both Roma and non-Roma. The group has broadened its efforts into community development, applied for funds to supply the village school with indoor toilets, and received 15,000 euros ($21,700) to build a milk collection center.

Just south of Crit, British landowners have built up a herd of 350 water buffalo, grass-fed and organically raised for milk production. Although water buffalo are generally considered too ornery for anything but hand milking, the owners have set up a successful machine-milking operation that they will soon expand.

To the north of Crit I visited a model farm managed by World Vision, a California-based Christian organization that has been working for several years in Eastern Europe. Farm manager Maria Todea told me that farmers who complete the World Vision course in small-farm management receive a diploma that allows them to apply for financial assistance from the government.

In the village of Malancrav, on a rise above a restored church, I walked up a terraced hillside among hundreds of apple trees in blossom. The air was fragrant and humming with bees. The orchard was purchased by the Eminescu Trust and has begun producing and bottling its own organic apple juice.

The Suciu family, at whose home I dined each night, has taken an entrepreneurial approach to all the organizations working in Transylvania. They opened their home to the trust's tourists. They accepted a pig from World Vision. Their son and daughter-in-law worked on the water buffalo farm and would be leaving for Bucharest the next morning to display their artisanal Transylvanian cheeses at a slow-food festival in the capital.

Given enough time and money, such projects might sustain the traditions of this lost world as it makes its transition into a new world economy. But the realities of poverty, the very evident missing generation that has already moved on, and the intransigence of both the E.U. and the Romanian bureaucracies have made the circumstances seem dire and intractable. The shepherds tending their flocks on emerald meadows, the herders guiding their cows along ancient paths, seemed destined to become anachronisms in the service of tourist nostalgia.

Even so, Lucian Holban told me in his office in the citadel of Sighisoara, "I am not pessimistic."

A short, slight, balding man with a trim mustache and goatee, Holban is a geochemical engineer whose former employer, GeoMed, asked him to come out of retirement and catalyze sustainable development efforts in 16 localities and two towns, an area of some 310 square miles with a population of 56,000. His territory is what the E.U. calls a Local Action Group Initiative. As its director, he says, his job is "to create conditions for projects that will build infrastructures for future development." When he sees likely opportunities, his challenge is to get them funding.

Continued...

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments

  • A K Gary wrote on March 06, 2008, 12:14PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    A wonderful article clearly highlights the risks posed by EU membership to villager ways of life here.
    Transylvania is and has been rich in ethno-diversity, as well as the bio-diversity discussed here. The people just 20 miles away from Crit in the Gagy Valley villages where I have visited several times are in most part Hungarian speaking. Hungarian, Saxon, Roma and Romanian peoples in the villages through the region all share the challenge to their ways of life. And the villagers further up in the valleys are quickly isolated by their rutted dirt roads, so the option of "developing non-farm activities" as suggested by the World Bank rep, which are mostly city related, are not really an option.

  • Doru Lucian Iliesiu wrote on May 14, 2008, 11:10PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    I was born and raised in northern Transylvania, and defected from communist Romania in 1969 as a student in architecture. My background is a mixture of Romanian, Hungarian, and Austrian. English people and their Internet sites usually maintain the tradition of being fair, but your article expresses a very limited and biased perspective about Transylvania, it has several essential omissions, and it includes misleading statements that I considered offensive:

    (1) You do not mention at all that the largest-by-far majority of its population is Romanian, and it has a Latin background as the name of this region indicates (“Transsilvania” in Latin, meaning as you write: “through the woods”); the capital of the Dacians, initially a Thracian tribe before becoming part of the Roman Empire, was in the south-west of Transylvania, not very far from the area you are describing; therefore, “The creators of Transylvania's lost world were...” first the Romanians, not the Saxons;

    (2) The site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romania includes the following phrase: “In 2002, the oldest modern human (Homo sapiens) remains in Europe were discovered in the "Cave With Bones" (Peşstera cu Oase) near Anina in present day Romania.[15] The remains (the lower jaw) are approximately 42,000 years old and have been nicknamed "John of Anina" (Ion din Anina).” This Cave is located within the Carpathian Mountains south-west of the Dacians’ capital-city ruins.

    (3) The Saxons did not migrate “to the region in the twelfth century” but were colonized as mercenaries at that time by the Hungarians/Magyars in the southern part of Transylvania, after they conquered its several city-states during the 10th and 11th centuries, in order to protect militarily the passages through the Carpathian Mountains from the Romanian-speaking people of the southern planes that became the principality of Wallachia around 1310;

    (4) The site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transylvania includes the following phrases: “In its early history, the territory of Transylvania belonged to a variety of Empires and States, including Dacia, the Roman Empire, ... As a political entity, (Southern) Transylvania is mentioned from the 12th century as a county (Alba) of the Kingdom of Hungary . ... It then became an autonomous principality under nominal Ottoman suzerainty in 1571. A few centuries later, in 1688, it was added to the expanding territories of Habsburg Monarchy, then became again a part of the Kingdom of Hungary within the newly established Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1867. Since World War I, it has been part of Romania, apart from a brief period of Hungarian occupation during World War II.”

    (5) It is correct that “Transylvania did not become a part of Romania until 1918,” but you omit to mention when Romania was formed; again the site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romania specifies: “The electors in both Moldavia and Wallachia chose in 1859 the same person – ... – as prince ....[55] Thus, Romania was created as a personal union, albeit a Romania that did not include Transylvania, where the upper class and the aristocracy remained mainly Hungarian, although Romanian nationalism inevitably ran up against Hungarian nationalism at the end of the 19th century.“

    (6) The way you present Transylvania’s history appears to be a subtle case for presenting again and endorsing Hungary’s claim to Transylvania.

    (7) It is incorrect to generalize that "In Transylvania you will see a preindustrial, self-sufficient agricultural system." Certainly there are many areas as you describe, but it is demeaning to present the whole Transylvania as such.

    D. Lucian Iliesiu, Architect, New York, NY

  • Iulian wrote on June 24, 2008, 10:01AM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    @ Mr. Lucian Iliescu
    your internet sources are wrong. Wikipedia is not a citable source for everything.

Comment on this article


Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | About OnEarth | All Authors | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Media Kit | Contact the Editors | NRDC Home

NRDC