"We're Doing God's Science"

by Tim Folger

Click for full-size image Houghton first lectured on global warming 40 years ago. Orchard Represents

(Page 3 of 3)

Houghton and I have nearly reached Abergynolwyn, where we'll catch a train back to the trailhead at Dolgoch Falls. He points to some deep holes on a hillside across the valley. "Those are old mine shafts," he says. "There was quite a bit of mining in this area in the nineteenth century -- mining for slate, for copper; some lead mines."

In those days the consequences of consumption lay close at hand. Today's global economy buffers us from the effects of a lifestyle that ravages the world. Each person in the United States consumes about 120 times the amount of resources as someone in Bangladesh. That disparity is -- or should be -- the great moral issue of our time, says Houghton.

He believes that the challenge of global warming offers the developed world a chance for moral regeneration, and in that sense might be good news -- which is the literal meaning of the word gospel. It's a point of view shared by Michael Northcott, an Anglican priest and friend of Houghton's. I'd spoken a few days earlier with Northcott at the University of Edinburgh, where he is a professor of ethics.

"Living lower down on the food chain environmentally will also be good for our souls," Northcott told me. "Jesus reckoned that wealth was the biggest threat to human spiritual health. Jesus didn't say it would be very hard for a gay person to get into the kingdom of heaven, or that it would be very hard for a divorced person. He said it would be very hard for a rich man. Cheap energy has made us rich. We will need to be a little less rich, I think. Right now the world's developed nations aren't prepared to do that, but I think it's entirely possible as an outcome." 

In the absence of a morally transformed global community, Houghton says the developed world must take some practical steps now. The single most pressing challenge, he says, is to make sure that all new coal-fired power plants are equipped with technology that captures and stores their carbon dioxide emissions. China is building two coal-fired plants every week. And since a typical plant lasts 50 years, decisions about their design will affect emissions for decades to come. "We've got to get on with it," says Houghton. "We need that investment in carbon capture now!"

Despite all the challenges, Houghton remains optimistic for three reasons. First, he believes the technology and funding exist to solve the problem. He cites estimates that moving to a carbon-neutral economy would require less than 1 percent of the world's GDP. Second, he says the scientific community is committed to solving the problem. Finally, what sustains him the most is his belief that God cares for creation.

Houghton spends much of his time now trying to relay that third point to his fellow evangelicals, especially in the United States. Over the past few years he has become friendly with Richard Cizik, vice president for governmental affairs of the powerful National Association of Evangelicals, which represents some 50,000 American churches. Cizik attended a meeting that Houghton organized at Oxford, at which a number of leading climate scientists talked about global warming.

"At the end of the meeting Cizik told me he never realized that scientists could be so humble, which I thought was interesting," Houghton says. "He was impressed by the reluctance of scientists to say more than they were absolutely sure of. He describes it quite publicly as a Damascus Road experience on his part."

Since that meeting Cizik has faced an uphill battle in trying to convince his fellow evangelicals that efforts to halt global warming should be high on their political agenda. "Scientists are perceived by evangelicals to be Darwinian evolutionists," he told me in a telephone interview. "Most evangelicals reject evolution. So they reject what scientists say about climate change. Climate change becomes a victim of the evolution debate.  But I'm persuaded that evangelicals can change their minds. They can get out of their iron-cage, anti-science way of thinking and become the activists behind climate change. Because if not us, who?"

Houghton says that Cizik's efforts are crucial. "The biggest problem in the world is getting the American religious right on board, because if that happened, the whole thing would be transformed."

 

On the morning after our hike, while sitting in Houghton's home, I notice a coffee table book called Private Views of Snowdonia, a collection of photographs of the park, accompanied by short essays. One of the photos shows Crib Goch and Moel Siabod, two peaks in Snowdonia. It carries a text by Houghton. Before catching my train to London, I ask him about the mountains.

"They're some of the finest ridge walks in Britain," he says. On the day he climbed Crib Goch and Moel Siabod, the mountains were covered with mist. Occasionally the mist broke, revealing spectacular vistas. It was, he says, a gradual process of disclosure, offering brief glimpses of a previously hidden reality. "I think heaven must be rather like that."

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3

Comments

  • Steven Earl SALMONY wrote on December 09, 2008, 08:46AM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    On the need for acknowledging God's science with regard to the human overpopulation of Earth in these early years of Century XXI...........

    Dear Friends of the OnEarth community,

    I want to at least try to gain your quick help. I'm not sure if you've heard, but yesterday the "AWAREness Campaign on the Human Population" submitted an idea for how we think the Obama Administration could change America. It's called "Ideas for Change in America."

    I've submitted an idea and wanted to see if you could vote for it. The title is: Accepting human limits and Earth's limitations. You can read and vote for the idea by clicking on the following link:

    http://www.change.org/ideas/view/accepting_human_limits_and_earths_limit...

    The top 10 ideas are going to be presented to the Obama Administration on Inauguration Day and will be supported by a national lobbying campaign run by Change.org, MySpace, and more than a dozen leading nonprofits after the Inauguration. So each idea has a real chance at becoming policy.

    Thanks.

    Sincerely yours,

    Steve

    Steven Earl Salmony
    AWAREness Campaign on the Human Population,
    established 2001
    http://sustainabilityscience.org/content.html?contentid=1176

  • Keith Petersen wrote on December 12, 2008, 04:15PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    I'm pleased that you've featured Houghton in the issue. It's one more piece of evidence showing Christian evangelicals need not be opposed to scientific inquiry. Very fit of us fit the negative stereotypes. It's frustrating that all too often the "Christians" who make the most noise are the most ignorant and foolish.

    I was also touched by the setting of the article. I spent a semester in Wales and have been to most of the places mentioned. Thank you!

  • Rev. Phil Manke wrote on December 29, 2008, 11:53AM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    Faith will indeed see us through. Our knowing of how the mind works is still an intensely interesting and contested frontier. I offer this for your consideration.:
    We each have a mind given us by the Love that created us; call it God or whatever. God is NOT a jealous God. What is all powerful and truthful needs not our petty emotion to be as it is. We have written many meanings on the face of truth. Organized religion has not necessarily helped in this regard.
    We each also have a mindset we made. That is the ego. The egos goal is suffering and death and its defense is in studying itself and sophistication of all it knows, and it's defense is required daily to ensure it will survive in spite of your true mind, that remains with you. Ego will offer any solution, provided that it will not work.
    Faith in your true mind is simple, but it seems difficult because it requires letting go of, or undoing the complexity of obstruction we made to hide it. The ego fights the undoing savagely because undergoing it means its death, and the corpses of many people have been piled up to defend this construct. It is based in illusion, and knows it, but also knows it must keep you from realizing this simple point. Seeing is a choice. See only Love in all beings and the ego will disappear. Seeing love is an inner realization reflected outward. Seeing with fear is what the ego wants for you because it means your death, even though it will die as well. This is the classic conundrum the ego hides from your awareness, and is why it is insane in all it sees.
    This is not religion. It is simple mind truth.
    Eternal life is granted in the vision of one mind, shared by all.

View All 8 Comments

Comment on this article


Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | About OnEarth | All Authors | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Media Kit | Contact the Editors | NRDC Home

NRDC