OnEarth Magazine: Subscribe | Current Issue
Your OnEarth: Login / Register
Groundbreaking journalism needs your support
SUBSCRIBE TODAY and enjoy a special introductory offer: A full year for just $15!

Dreamboat

Royal Caribbean's new "green" mega-liner still burns the world's dirtiest fuel. Can the cruise industry clean up its act? Table of Contents | Digital Edition
Guardian Environmental Network

Reporting and commentary from OnEarth editors and correspondents
These photos were taken eight years apart, not four days as stated in your article. NASA's Earth Observatory source article clearly states that the first photo was taken on August 22, 2002 and the second on August 18, 2010. The observation of collapsing ice shelves as evidence of warming is still significant, and unfortunately this kind of sloppy reporting robs your magazine of credibility. (Also note that you have dated the upper photo 2020. I know NASA is high-tech, but I think taking future-photos is still beyond them.)
Thanks for catching that error. I regret having made it. Unfortunately, mistakes occur in reporting, which is why most newspapers and magazines issue "corrections" to past articles. How lucky that in blogging, we can usually depend upon readers to note our mistakes!
Wha? No comment on the Chinese and Indian drive to increase industrialization, and emissions ?
What comment would you like to make on those issues? What China and India do about their carbon pollution is very important, of course. Still, my initial question would be, why reference the actions of the US, which has long styled itself a world leader on personal freedoms and upright governance, to those of one of the most repressive regimes (China), or one of the most corrupt representative democracies (India), to guide national policy on climate and energy? (This is about as logical as as comparing the US, a multi-cultural nation founded on principles of democracy and religious freedom, to Saudi Arabia, an autocratic one-religion state, when it comes to building religious and cultural centers in downtown Manhattan.) The U.S. remains the second-greatest greenhouse gas polluter (second presently to China), and historically the world's top GHG polluter. So this nation's seeming inability to act on climate change is an important problem. Even in an economic downtime, the U.S. has enormous resources to apply to cutting our greenhouse pollution -- much greater on a per-person basis than either China's or India's, where many millions of people still live in extreme poverty. Despite appearances, we've also got a much more powerfully situated and (potentially) effective regulatory system for preventing or curbing pollution. All that said, it's interesting that China's apparently going to beat the pants off the US in manufacturing clean energy technology.
Still trying to push your Glo-Bull-ist warming B.S. are you? No, regardless how much hewey you throw out the people don't want to shell out a fraud carbon tax to line the elite Globullists' pockets so that we can be brought to bankruptcy and dependent to your dictatoral "One World Government", under a "New World Order"! You are not going to get your New World Order!
Using the data that the ice shelves are upwards of 6000 years old, one wonders what caused the conditions before the ice shelves even formed. It must have been hot enough previous to these formations to prevent ice from building in these areas. Then the climate must have changed to such a degree that it was then possible for this ice to start accumulating. It now seems that we might be cycling back to what ever conditions prevented this ice from being there. I read these sorts of stories weekly and no one ever asks why the ice wasn't there before it formed and what caused it to form? The answers to those questions will probably tell you why these shelves are disintegrating now.
Good questions. I believe quite a lot is known, via the geological record, about the conditions in the eras you're curious about. The discipline is called "paleoclimate" research, if you'd like to dig around about it at your local library. When it comes to contemporary climate change, though, we're not being dragged along by phenomena on the geologic time scale. We're not involuntarily "cycling back" to a pre-glacial condition. We've brought it upon ourselves, unnaturally, by overloading the atmosphere with heat-trapping gases.