The guy from Texas is taking the giant tarball that the guy from Pensacola wants. The guy from Pensacola, a good guy named James who I met about an hour ago, thinks he should collect the tarball, which is the biggest one he’s seen, and bring it to the attention of the EPA officials. But James is a peaceful man, a surfer whose skin has been burned to a crisp brown over the years, and he simply shrugs when the Texas guy picks up the lump of oil, a lump that is definitely bigger than a bread basket, and carts it off. The little girl, the Texas guy’s daughter who had been swimming in the oily water (holding hands with her mom) a few minutes ago, turns defensive when I suggest that James has rightful claim to the tarball.
"If he touches that tarball, my Daddy will kick his ass," she says.
She can’t be older than eight, and she follows her father back to their truck, where they place the tarball, a toxic prize to bring home with them (though now Texas has tarballs of its own).
"They’re real good on the grill with a little paprika," James yells after them.
After the commotion, James and I settle back in our beach chairs and do what we have been doing since we met: watching birds. I had other ideas for the afternoon, but I pulled over at this empty beach lot because I saw an osprey working the line of surf, and ospreys have a way of scuttling my best-laid plans. I kept trying to leave, but the bird kept returning to hunt, hovering above the crashing waves, its black and white wings semaphore flashing, its yellow eyes burning behind a black bandit mask. When James showed up to take pictures of birds, he noticed that I couldn’t take my eyes off the osprey and said as much. Then he added what many people have said to me over the years:
"You really seem to like those birds."
I could have said, "Little do you know, James, that I have in fact written two books about ospreys." But since I’m not a giant dick, I went with, "Yup."
We pass the afternoon sitting in our fold-out beach chairs, drinking beers and watching the osprey, along with diving terns, a couple of pelicans gliding through the trough of waves, and the highlight -- a black skimmer with its dazzling candy corn upper bill and its lower mandible dropped so that it cut a wake through the surf. James reminds me a little of the actor who played Dan-o on Hawaii 5-0 (who my father knew in college), maybe because of his amiable way, short stature, and the fact that the show featured surfing during its theme song. He tells me that the local surf report specifies where the oil is and isn’t each day, but that once when he went to one of the spots where it supposedly wasn’t, his wife’s white bathing suit turned gray. Still, he is relatively optimistic about the spill.
"That’s a big body of water out there. Everything in there gets diluted. And nature’s resilient, you know. The winter storms will help clear it off the beaches."
Surfers, almost by default, become amateur naturalists, and he does admit that he has seen fewer dolphins and far fewer jumping fish. We speculate on whether or not the oil is hindering the diving birds, like the osprey, and whether or not they know something is up. Can they taste a difference in the fish or see it in the viscosity of the water? If they are aware of what is going on, they must be thinking -- and of course I’m anthropomorphizing here -- the osprey equivalent of "not again." After all, this is a species that was all but eradicated, along with the local pelicans and bald eagles (which James says are now making a comeback), by DDT not too long ago.
The Rachel Carson story, and the story of the banning of DDT, are old chestnuts of the environmental movement, anachronistic in a hopeful way that may not seem applicable in these darker times. But as I spent the morning reading articles about BP’s use of Corexit and watching marine toxicologist Chris Pincetech talk about how using the dispersants was turning the Gulf into one giant science experiment, I found myself thinking again of DDT, and the old story seemed newly applicable. The story, which most of us know by now, begins with the spraying of DDT on fields and marshes, with the non-malevolent goal of eliminating pests (insects). But what the chemical proved, in a giant science experiment not unlike the one we are undertaking right now, was that "the web of life" was not some fanciful notion that a groovy ecologist invented. In fact, the way that DDT moved through that web -- killing the insects, sure, but also moving up through the food chain to the vegetation and smaller fish and then, through biomagnification, settling in larger quantities in top predators like ospreys and eagles -- was almost as miraculous as the web itself. Almost. But while the web created life, the chemical created death. The way it killed off ospreys was particularly cruel: it caused a thinning of the egg shells so that when the parents sat atop the eggs to incubate, they killed their own offspring.
And now we are at it again. Look, the companies who made DDT and the people who sprayed it were not evil people. Who wouldn’t want to get rid of mosquitoes on a marsh? They weren’t evil, but they just believed, in the manner of little boys, that they could control things. They believed they could make things better than they were and could always fix what was broken (never thinking that some of the things they might break had taken a million years or so to make, in concert with other creatures and ecosystems).
As tragic and awful as the oil spill is -- and it is truly horrific -- the use of dispersants could end up being worse. You can at least argue that the first mistake was an accident, an accident born of colossal arrogance, but still an accident. The second mistake grew out of opposites: conscious decision and panic. My contacts down here tell me that the BP people operate with eyes wide from fear, and fear has quickly led to a desperate need for the illusion of control. I don’t claim to know what Corexit or other dispersants will do, how it will infiltrate and affect the web of life of fish and birds. I am not a scientist. But I know that good science is born of skepticism, and that those who claim with confidence that they know what the Corexit will do are thinking the thinking of little boys. Which means they are thinking that you can fix nature like you fix a carburetor. And forgetting that everything is connected in way that surpasses any sort of human conception, let alone human engineering. “When you pick up one thing, you find it connected to everything else on earth,” wrote John Muir. Exactly. And when you spray, pour, poison one thing, you will quickly find that you are doing the same to all.
* * *
Lecture over (for today).
James and I watch ospreys and drink beer until the sun starts to set. I smoke a small cigar I bought at a store called The Tobacco Exchange back in Gulf Shores. We say goodbye (and James promises to send me the pictures that I’ve attached here), and then he tells me where I can get a good look at an osprey nest from up close, at a picnic area farther up in the park.
It is a perfect way to end the day, and not just because the nest is one of the most beautiful I’ve ever seen, a nestled cup of sticks in the upper branches of a dead live oak, a tree that was likely killed by the salt overwash from Hurricane Ivan. Three young birds -- identifiable as immatures by both their size and checkered wings -- perch around and on the nest, illuminated by the last shafting rays of sun. They let go with high-pitched warning cries that tell me not to get any closer. But what makes the scene so apt is not just its beauty, but the fact that the osprey cries mix with another sort of music: the backward beeping of trucks. And that is because the picnic area has become mission control for the clean-up efforts, and the birds now share their habitat with trucks and the dumpsters and the fluorescent-vested workers and dozens of porta-potties and hundreds of all-terrain vehicles. It looks like a scene out of Spielberg: the military trying to keep the discovery of aliens under wraps. But what might be too cliché for a movie is the fact that above it all the ospreys nest, the whole scene watched over by a bird that came back from the dead.
P.S. If you are interested in the nature of this beach, here are some nice bird photos by a local blogger.
P.P.S. If you want to scare yourself about Corexit (corrects it!), there are plenty of great articles to read. But maybe the simplest way is to just read the brief Wikipedia entry. Last I heard, Wikipedia was not a radical environmental operation.
David Gessner, a frequent OnEarth contributor, is visiting the Gulf Coast to report on the BP disaster. Follow his journey.
Its Monkey Business or “modern” Business of today’s “Man-Age”….
Suppose all of this so called "spewed-oozed" OIL had been collected and contained in far flung containers worldwide, processed as tar for our roads or refined as fuel for our transport fleet, then none of this hoopla would have taken the shape of monster news event for worldwide. Perhaps, the impact or magnitude of the OIL would have been same on our environment on air and land both. The gas would have added much more carbon contents had it got burnt or tar would have covered much more square miles across the world than the "oozed" layer of oil we see over the surface of waters in the gulf. The issue is, the immediate psychological impact of "what we see is what we get" which is much smaller foot print in a concentrated portion of the area compared to had we used in gas or in tar form spreading all over the world. As a result this has definitely caused a panic effect among all of us, especially for / to the people living near the epic center of "oozing" oil.
Conclusively had we contained all of the oozing oil as if it did not have ruptured the way it is, then obviously no one would have known about how much of the oil has been contained away or say "hidden away", which could have been refined to be used as fuel with much more "severe" impact of carbon foot print and heaps of "solid" waste of tar and other residuals spread all over the beautiful landscape as "black top road". Hence, it would have been "slow & silent spew" of carbon in the air or cladding beautiful land with black top tar, with no much noise or attention as compared to what we have seen/heard in over last 60 days.
Figure this, the current massive oil oozing, is significantly pretty small as compared to over 100 yrs of oil usage, that have caused much greater damage by inducing and injecting real life carbon contents in the environment by burning fuel along with cladding over millions of square miles over the beautiful landscape called "road to success" to roll the "train of every day transportation".
With all above, why do we want to pull political pundits into this? What political figures can do in this issue, except taking advantage of fueling their own agenda to propagate their own point of view for their own or party's sake?
It’s all about man-made mad processes, politics, products, policies......that never let the "lonely" man-kind live and die in peace, rather in “p.i.e.c.e.s"!
Like it use to be dark ages, then came stone ages, here comes man-made "man-age" , go figure and manage the mess together.
Sometimes all this makes me think, while REAPING the Profits out OF or FOR "earthly" resources, why are we RAPING the Mother Earth? isn't mother earth has already given us enough to sustain with basic earthly/environ friendly transportation needs? Like there's provision for all kinds of terrains, for nice paved road there's Horse and horse driven carriage, for muddy-paddy area or needs more "Hummer" power, then there's elephant ride or elephant driven carriage, if there's desert sandy terrain then there's camel or camel pulled carriage, if it is agriculture fields, there’s OX. All natural environmental friendly with perfectly synchronized speed and no need of seat belts or PPE, with zero to slim chance of high speed road accidents.
As compared to automobiles these "god given good" natural transportation resources are far better than our own complicated pieces of so called "automobiles". The natural transportation model has no environment pollution thru its operational life cycle, and no toxic waste at "the end of product life cycle". Whereas, the "man-made mad" car takes and emits all kinds of chemicals to produce or to make it functional thru its operational life cycle, till "the end of product life cycle", with high level of concentrated toxic solids or gaseous waste, which are obviously NOT biodegradable. Moreover, there are so many variables to produce and functionally make the car run with high probability of failures and unreliability, it’s like "out of control". Whereas the natural transportation model has less operating variables with much higher confidence level, reliability and way over "under-control". (Same applies for the operating and maintenance cost between both types of transportation models, off-course the natural model is more economically cost effective than "Man Made MAD Machine Model")
Now here comes the hybrid and alternate fuel type cars, may use or emit low on gases. Perhaps to produce these hybrids it may take heaps of chemicals thru process, to making it functional or replace and dump batteries, and most importantly at "end of product life", the solid wastes will be enormous with heavy metal batteries. By volume weight, hybrids and electric cars would have much higher levels of toxic wastes as compared to todays, full combustion fueled cars.
It’s all about “victimization” and “ownership”……..we think as if we are the OWNERS of this planet and universe, with “can do anything freedom attitude”, as if all is FREE to abuse and use the mother earth however whenever, where ever we want and like, without evaluating the environmental, ecological or geological impacts. As a result here’s what we got, “go figure the mess and fix it”, this is what we are telling our next generation to do. Today, what we have created, all the gadgets to add “comforts of lifestyle” at all levels are biting us back in the butt.
Causing health issues, environ issues, depleting cultures, causing endless industrial or accidents in road, mid air, at home thru all walks of life. All of it, it’s the result of what we “own” is what makes us “victim” about. By “reaping” the profits out of or for earthly resources, we are “raping” the beautiful form, fit and function of our mother earth, disturbing with its environ, eco-system, landscape, minerals, vegetation, animal life, languages and cultures of human settlement across the horizon, making it more “global economy”. If you don’t like or I don’t like we have a “safety shield” of WMDs (ammos) filled with massive amount of chemically refined reactive compound to cause intensive destruction by bio-toxic or implosion or explosion. This is hoopla of global peace by hoax, force or torch.
Question is, do we “have to” discover anything everything that is possible within our capacity, regardless of its implications or consequences on “ourselves” as human race, environment, ecosystem and underground geophysics of earth’s structure? Why do we “have to” fiddle with natural phenomenon and cause problems or threaten ourselves with environmental disasters? Why aren’t there limits to exploration and experimentation of “technological advancements”? Didn’t we learned lessons from our parents or guardians at early childhood, for NOT to cross the road or do not go where you are not suppose to? Why are we touching or discovering things that are dangerous now and for generations to come? Resulting in accidents, disasters, mishaps…every fraction of the second every day and night……..all as result of dangerous Man Made Mad Machine Model….. (Manmade process; politics and products do not let us live and die in peace rather in pieces)
Isn’t human life is possible with limited type and abundance of resources that nature has already designed and gave us for FREE? (So why can’t we Free-up Resources for Environment Excellence). Our ancestors lived on it, in peace with no damage to environment, ecosystem. Now imagine, what we have done in last 100 yrs and what we are up to, and keep on continuing at same pace, what is going to happen to our environ and eco-system and most importantly to our future generation? What are we giving them? Problems, clean up after us? Shame on us………it’s like, “Raping the mother earth by Reaping the profits from its resources”!
It’s like monkey copying another monkey cutting the tree, and chopping-off the same tree branch as he sits on…………..
The views/comments presented by Bro.Vikas is indeed mind blowing.Green light must raise the voice so that whole world could learn ON EARTH CITIZEN in true sense.








![Into_the_Gulf048[1] Into the Gulf journal](http://billanddavescocktailhour.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Into_the_Gulf0481-300x270.jpg)
![2010-06-29_09.46.21[1] Tarballed beach](http://billanddavescocktailhour.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/2010-06-29_09.46.211-300x224.jpg)









