OnEarth Magazine: Subscribe | Current Issue
Your OnEarth: Login / Register
Groundbreaking journalism needs your support
SUBSCRIBE TODAY and enjoy a special introductory offer: A full year for just $15!

Poseidon Lost

We thought the sea was infinite and inexhaustible. It is not. Calling for a new vision to save our oceans. Table of Contents | Digital Edition
Guardian Environmental Network

Reporting and commentary from OnEarth editors and correspondents
Interesting comments about the Diablo Canyon facility located on a lower risk fault - "probably wouldnt produce greater than 6.5 magnitude" - can you elaborate? Last night one newscast (maybe CNN?) claimed Diablo was designed to withstand 7.5 magnitude but gave no correlation to probability - only a raised eyebrow since Sendai was a 9.0. .
Hi Tim -- basically, it seems that the Shoreline fault, just offshore from Diablo Canyon, is a type of fault that has what is known as a strike-slip faulting mechanism. From what I've read, such faults and the details of this one in particular pose less risk of generating large tsunamis. In applying for relicensing of the facility, Pacific Gas & Electric and the NRC determined that the 6.5-magnitude quake that is the likely maximum along that fault line would not seriously threaten the plant. Of course, as I mentioned in my post above, I'm guessing that Japan was fairly confident of its plants' ability to withstand quakes as well. You can find more info on their process here: http://diablocanyonpge.com/home/resources/shoreline-fault-zone-report-with-plates.html