OnEarth Magazine: Subscribe | Current Issue
Your OnEarth: Login / Register
Groundbreaking journalism needs your support
SUBSCRIBE TODAY and enjoy a special introductory offer: A full year for just $15!

Urban Harvest

Confronting climate change and poverty, a new crop of city farmers comes of age in Africa.
Guardian Environmental Network

Nicked by Nalgene? Try Stainless Steel

image of bcarmichael

For every age, there is a remedy. And for nearly every remedy, a folly. The Romantic Poets famously had their laudanum, the Victorians their adulterated tea. So bad was the latter that Punch magazine ran a cartoon of a little girl at a grocery counter saying, "If you please, Sir, Mother says, will you let her have a quarter of a pound of your best tea to kill the rats with, and an ounce of chocolate as would get rid of the black beadles."

Could the same thing be true for my Nalgene?

Drink water, I've been told, and you live a healthier life. For many of us who have taken this adage to heart, Nalgene has become the brand of choice for our daily water consumption. For me, over the past decade, when my Nalgene hasn't been with me on the hiking trail, it's been here, on my desk, where I fill and refill it multiple times a day.

But a series of news articles, and studies, has raised a series of warning signals about bisphenol-a (BPA), a man-made chemical contained in the kind of polycarbonate plastics used to make Nalgenes, baby bottles, and other consumer products. In 2004, 2.3 billion pounds of BPA was produced in the U.S. alone.

BPA's are what is known as endocrine disruptors. Endocrine tissues, as the sites that produce hormones, are often vital and constitute one of the body's primary communication networks. BPAs have the ability to trick these areas into treating it like estrogen, and disrupt the communication and coordination facilitated by the body's naturally produced hormones. Because of this, they're linked to issues of obesity, infertility, and sexual deformities. Newborn babies and pregnant women are at the greatest risk. (My colleague Laura Wright has written about this in an excellent blog post and article for On Earth.)

The risk isn't limited to these groups, however -- BPA is found in nearly all of us. In 2004, a study by the CDC showed that 92.6% of over 2,000 urine samples showed detectable levels of BPA. Women had higher levels than men, as did people of lower income.

Today, the National Toxicology Program (NTP) released a study of bisphenol A. Gina Solomon, on NRDC's Switchboard, had this summary: "NTP states that there is ‘clear evidence' that at high doses bisphenol A is a developmental toxin, capable of causing death in newborn animals, reduced growth in the womb and in early life, and changes in the age of puberty."

A NY Times article today reports that the Canadian government is ready to label BPA a toxic. Some NGO's, like Environmental Defense, are lobbying for a ban of BPA in food and beverage containers, while at least one store, The Mountain Equipment Co-op, in Vancouver, BC, has removed Nalgenes from their shelves.

The irony is that Nalgene has long been an accessory, if not a symbol, of the environmentally active. And despite the growing body of evidence, Nalgene continues to "firmly believe in the safety of [their] products containing BPA." Their website has a number of links, many to fact sheets produced by the plastics industry.

And so what alternatives do we have? I've been thinking a lot about this recently. Here's what I've found, though the answer is still uncertain.

There is a general consensus that stainless steel is much better than plastic. Companies like SIGG and Kleen Kanteen offer simple, stylish canisters.

But there are rumors that SIGG's bottles, though stainless steel, are lined with a polycarbonate resin that contains BPAs. These seem to be false. There is some informaiton about a water-based lining. But all of this is unconfirmed. Click here for a letter from the president of SIGG USA.

SIGG does have a number of things going for them: The bottle are 100% recyclable, they participate in 1% For the Planet, and the designs are far more stylish than any of the competitors.

Kleen Kanteen also makes a nice bottle. They are made in China, but the company claims they're made responsibly. And if you're married to plastic, Camelbak offers BPA-free plastic bottles.

At this point, I say go for SIGG or Kleen Kanteen.

Anyone have any suggestions? Or know anything decisive about SIGG and BPAs? Your comments are welcome.

 

Update (4/22/08): The New York Times has a good overview of the BPA issue, as well as a good recommendation. Click here for the story.

How do I lower my exposure?

Switch to frozen or fresh vegetables. Use glass, porcelain and stainless-steel containers, particularly for hot foods and liquids. If you don’t want to use a glass baby bottle, several companies, including the popular brand Born Free, now sell BPA-free baby bottles and sippy cups. For formula-fed babies, you can switch to powdered formula rather than liquid.

Although many plastic products claim to be microwave safe, some scientists warn against putting any plastic in the microwave. “There is such a wide variety now, from disposable containers to actual Tupperware,” says Dr. Anila Jacob, a senior scientist for the Environmental Working Group, a Washington-based advocacy group. “I don’t know of anyone who has done definitive testing of all these different types of plastic containers to see what is leaching into food.”

 

image of bcarmichael
Ben Carmichael has been a regular contributor since the fall of 2006. He writes about the environment, food and fishing. His work has appeared on The Huffington Post, The Yale Forum on Climate Change & The Media, and Print magazine. He has worked on ... READ MORE >

Actually, thanks to consumer demand, Nalgene has started to phase out BPA from their products (though currently the original polycarbonate bottles still have BPA). They do offer a couple alternatives to their original polycarbonate bottle. The ultralite HDPE is made from high density polyethylene instead of polycarbonate, and is free from BPA and phthalates. It has the same impact resistance, and is mostly free from resisting odors. It's dishwasher safe, highly recyclable, microwaveable, and made in the USA. It's translucent instead of transparent like the polycarbonate bottles, though. Nalgene will also offer a stainless steel bottle from Guyot designs in spring of 2008.
I have two kleen kanteten bottles right now, and I like them a lot.

Some of the information in the original post is not accurate. Sigg bottles are not made of stainless steel, they are made of aluminum. It is not a "rumor" that they are lined with a coating, it is a fact, freely admitted by the company. All aluminum bottles are coated because uncoated aluminum leaches toxins. That is the reason why soada cans have an epoxy caoting that contains BPA, as NRDC has reported. According to the original Sigg publicity, their coating is made of "water-based epoxy". Since the BPA issue started receiving publicity, Sigg has removed this language from their advertising but it remains on many of their vendors websites. Sigg claims their coating is 100% safe, but the only studies have been ones that Sigg paid for, casting doubts on the results. Sigg has rejected all previous requests to release the ingredients of their coating. A good discussion on the topic can be found at:
http://www.freemarketorganics.com/coabsi.html

Hi Ben, Thanks for your comments. I always appreciate reader feedback, especially when you can help catch factual errors. You’re correct to point out that SIGG is made of aluminum, not stainless steel. This was my mistake. But I should clarify that I never disputed that SIGG canisters contain a lining. In fact, I pointed readers to a few links confirming they do. The question, rather, was whether this liner leaches BPA -- a question a lot of people are asking. An article from Treehugger posted few days ago asks this same question. Another article on Grist from a year ago also looks into this issue. You pointed out a discussion, as well. Many of these discussions come to the same conclusion: we just don’t know yet. There is evidence that the liners are safe, but much of this evidence is questionable because it was either paid for by SIGG, or comes from an unknown source. In my opinion, it seems like SIGG’s liners are safe, but it could be that we simply haven’t done enough research yet. There are other factors here that complicate the choice of which reusable water bottle to buy. On the one hand, SIGG is made from aluminum, which has been linked to Alzheimer's, and while is recyblable, is made from virgin, non-recycled aluminum -- a process with serious environmental side effects. (Note: I’m still trying to find information on the recycled content. I’ll update when I know more.) Kleen Kanteen’s products, on the other hand, are made in China. I see that someone in your discussion, Ben, chose to go with China. Not all will feel the same way. The lesson? It’s still an imperfect solution. Is manufacturing an aluminum bottle, coating it in a liner of undisclosed contents, and then shipping it off from Switzerland, or its US location, really without adverse side effects for our environment or our health? No. But it is better than plastic, in many ways. What we’re talking about is incremental change. I think we would agree that enabling people to make informed consumer decisions is essential to reducing environmental waste, and avoiding health risks. Thanks again for your comments. Best, Ben

To better understand the health hazards of food containers one must first understand the manufacturing process. The hazards of Nalgene products were discovered due to a better understanding of their manufacturing processes.

With continued focus on this issue and review of manufacturing of alternatives to Nalgene products, reveals similar concerns.

The lead content of stainless steel products activated by heat and cold extremes reveals that they are as safe as eating the chipped paint from a 1930's home. Resorting to glass or porcelain products exposes the user to formaldehyde levels of a pickled high school frog.

As a molecular engineer from California Institute of Technology at Pasadena, I fear that my duty to inform consumers nationwide of the fraud that is being perpetrated in replacing one hazardous material with another.

Another option now available is Hydro Flask's stainless steel water bottles. They are all double wall vacuum insulated keeping liquids hot and/or cold for hours.
Interesting I have never heard of these I just looked them up on google thnx for the heads up.
When I was in college I couldn't swing a dead cat without hitting someone with a Nalgene bottle hanging off their backpacks as they trudged around in their Teva sandles. I knew then that to keep refilling the same container over and over and over could NOT be good. I was thinking more about bacteria though. Like people drinking directly off of a pool liner. Turns out, 6 years later they release the study and I was at least half right. I love the Kleen Kantene stuff. I like the idea of the Camelbak but you won't catch me dead wearing one of those things.