OnEarth Magazine: Subscribe | Current Issue
Your OnEarth: Login / Register
Groundbreaking journalism needs your support
SUBSCRIBE TODAY and enjoy a special introductory offer: A full year for just $15!

Urban Harvest

Confronting climate change and poverty, a new crop of city farmers comes of age in Africa. Table of Contents | Digital Edition
Guardian Environmental Network

IPAMS (Independent Petroleum Association of Mountain States) sent this email to their members today. Let's make sure that the voices of those who support this bill are heard and this important legislation isn't derailed by the oil and gas industry.

From: Marc Smith [mailto:ipams@ipams.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 10:38 AM
Subject: If you don’t get what you want, just take it
 

Weekly Message from Marc W. Smith
 
Every year, for the last 20 years, “Red Rock Wilderness” legislation (H.R. 1925) has been introduced.  The Bill has consistently failed to gain significant Congressional support and the prospects of it passing this year are very slim - so why mention it? 
 
While the legislative threat is small, the administrative threat is growing.
 
This week, IPAMS has submitted a letter to the House Natural Resources Committee about the Bill, and pointed out that that parcels located within proposed Red Rock Wilderness lands are being removed by the Department of Interior from lease sales.  IPAMS strongly objects to de facto wilderness protection of lands that have been proposed, but not passed by Congress, and has called the Committee’s attention to this abuse of the law.  
 
Congressional passage of Red Rocks Wilderness Act would clearly limit future supply of natural gas in the U.S., but the mere fact that a Bill was introduced seems to be producing the same affect.   H.R. 1925 would eliminate all motorized access on 17% (9.4 million acres) of Utah’s federal lands.  Countless families who depend on mineral development, ranching and other uses of federal land would be needlessly harmed. 
 
In Utah, 12 million acres are already off limits to energy production.  If H.R. 1925 passes, a whopping 39% of the state’s federal land would be off-limits to most productive uses.  Does that represent balance?  Utah’s five Congressional representatives don’t think so, but that hasn’t deterred U.S. Representative Maurice Hinchey (D - New York) from introducing the Bill for yet another year. 
 
While the action of one Member of Congress from 2000+ miles away can be dismissed as misguided idealism, it is troubling that Department of Interior policy would use H.R. 1925 as a basis for managing lands “proposed” for Wilderness designation as if they already were Wilderness.
 
As Rep. Bishop (R-UT) indicates in his column, this bill is unlikely to gain any traction, but we will continue to monitor it and let you know if any action is required in the future. 
 
Click here to read IPAMS letter to the House Natural Resources Committee opposing H.R. 1925.
 
Sincerely,
 
Marc Smith
Independent Petroleum Association of Mountain States (IPAMS)
410 17th Street, Suite 700
Denver, CO 80202
303.623.0987
 

© copyright 2009 IPAMS, all rights reserved.

Enough is enough. It's time to call a halt to drilling and mining in uniquely beautiful places.