greenlight - Citizen Journalism onEarth

Editor's Picks |  Read All Community Posts

Will Large Institutional Investors Green Their Portfolios?

Two years ago, OnEarth ran an interesting article and podcast on socially responsible investing. Remembrance of those pieces quickened my interest in an article in yesterday's New York Times on green investment funds; the Times story provides something of a yardstick re how socially responsible investing is evolving.

Most significant is that the institutional-investing heavyweights -- pension funds, foundations, universities and the like -- are beginning to get involved:

Until recently, green investment funds were mostly a niche for individual investors. But now investing with the idea of improving the environmental actions of corporations, not just maximizing profit, is catching on among some big pension funds and foundations, particularly in Europe and even in the United States.

It's also plain to see that at least some of these funds are today more narrowly focused on climate change and have made leaps in the sophistication with which they are using their portfolios to encourage companies to reduce carbon footprints.

The Times story notes that a lot of institutional investors remain hesitant to commit to green investment funds, for fear that doing so will hurt earnings. Here's hoping that there are now enough large investors -- among those mentioned by the article are the California State Teachers' Retirement fund and the pension funds of several EU national governments -- taking the plunge to produce empirical evidence that maximizing earnings and socially responsible investing needn't be contradictory.

Comments

  • Steven Earl Salmony wrote on November 30, 2008, 03:40PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    Ummmm...........what will the greedy do?

    Perhaps it is time for the same ol' business-as-usual, pin-stripe-suited leaders, the ones who adamantly espouse and religiously exemplify an apostate's creed of greed, to be replaced by new leadership.

    Too many leaders of this patently unsustainable culture of avarice evidently define the culture's efficacy by the endless accumulation of material possessions; by the unbounded acquisition of more money, money, money, money; by recklessly overconsuming and relentlessly hoarding limited resources. They demonstrably declare to all the world that greed is good.

    Are we not members of a culture that worships consumerism? Are the products of greed nothing more or less than the objects of our idolatry?

    Are the pin-striped suits, fleet of cars, chauffeur, private jets, McMansions, distant hideaways, secret handshakes and exclusive clubs...... all "signatures" of success in a culture promoted by the 'goodness' of greed?

    Consider for a moment what perversity greed has wrought.

    Steven Earl Salmony
    AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population,
    established 2001
    http://sustainabilityscience.org/content.html?contentid=1176

Comment on this post
OnEarth is a quarterly magazine of thought and opinion on the environment. OnEarth and the Greenlight blog are open to diverse points of view; the opinions expressed by contributors, online commenters, and the editors are their own and not necessarily those of NRDC.


Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | About OnEarth | All Authors | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Media Kit | Contact the Editors | NRDC Home

NRDC