greenlight - Citizen Journalism onEarth

Editor's Picks |  Read All Community Posts

Tennessee's Toxic Nightmare: Arsenic Levels 35 to 300 Times EPA Standard for Drinking Water

 

Just-released independent water sampling data from the Tennessee coal ash disaster has shown alarmingly high levels of arsenic and seven other heavy metals, including cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury and thallium.

"I've never seen levels this high," said Dr. Shea Tuberty, Assistant Professor of Biology at the Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Lab at Appalachian State University. "These levels would knock out fish reproduction ... the ecosystems around Kingston and Harriman are going to be in trouble ... maybe for generations."

"Although these results are preliminary, we want to release them because of the public health concern and because we believe the TVA [Tennessee Valley Authority] and EPA aren't being candid,"said Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chair of the Waterkeeper Alliance.

Arsenic levels were especially worrisome. "From the water samples you gave us, we had anywhere from 35 to 300 times that [EPA] level" of 10 parts per billion for drinking water, said Tuberty to Upper Watauga Riverkeeper Donna Lisenby, who floated a kayak around the "ashbergs" on Decmber 27, five days after the disaster.

After testing for presence of 17 elements that are regulated by the EPA for drinking water, the Appalachian State University team of Tuberty and Dr. Carol Baybak found that the three water samples and one sediment sample provided by volunteers from the Waterkeeper Alliance and Appalachian Voices showed that "eight of them popped out as significantly higher than they should have been for drinking water."

The test data can be found here.

Meanwhile, the TVA continues to stall and delay releasing their water sampling data. TVA, which continues to refer to the disaster as a mere "ash slide," states that "information regarding air quality and water quality has already been published." Clicking the link provided by TVA for "water sample data" directs readers to data that was taken at the city of Kingston Water intake on Dec 22 and 23, the day of the disaster, and before the material started to migrate downstream. TVA does not provide any updated water sampling data on their website.

Chris Irwin, attorney for United Mountain Defense (UMD), a Knoxville-based non-profit that has been at the site since the day of the disaster writes on Jan 2:

"As I type TVA is trying to conduct their press conference - but they are having a small problem: volunteers from United Mountain Defense have handed out the latest [water] test results to all of the press there and are refusing to stop. I just got off the phone with one of our volunteers. He said at first TVA threatened to arrest him if he did not leave. He said he would not--and all the cameras turned on him."

"Gil Francis--TVA's Public relations guy apparently nearly had a heart attack. If UMD can get this data, why can't TVA?"

While some authorities are proposing dredging to remove the ash from the bottom of the Emory River, "dredging will be a nightmare," said Waterkeeper volunteer John Wathen of Alabama. "Constantly stirring the material will cause continuous turbidity issues. Turbidity, or fine clays is where the toxins are contained. Dredging will keep this material waterborne and in transmittable form to be dealt with for miles."

[This article is cross-posted at the Huffington Post.]

Comments

  • Bead Waas wrote on October 12, 2009, 01:20PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    Unscrupulous companies are trying to Greenwash fly ash and profit from this hazardous waste.

    Calstar Products is trying to sell coal fly ash bricks - the company is claiming that the bricks are safe, but their own results show that they leach toxins like arsenic, antimony, beryllium, cadmium, lead, manganese, mercury and nickel.

    These crooks are going to poison people - their fly ash bricks are going to be the next asbestos.

    See the following links:

    http://techpulse360.com/2008/10/23/reader-comments-on-fly-ash-brick-toxi...

    http://www.greentechmedia.com/green-light/post/here-comes-the-green-bric...

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-10359630-54.html

    http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/inside-the-green-brick-house...

  • Bead Waas wrote on October 12, 2009, 01:20PM : Flag this comment as inappropriate Flag this comment as inappropriate

    The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) – an unbiased authority dedicated to protecting the environment has a very useful review of coal fly ash (http://www.nrdc.org/energy/coalwaste/default.asp) and its toxicity.

    NRDC categorizes coal fly ash as a Contaminated Coal Waste

    NRDC states “toxic material is laced throughout” the fly ash

    NRDC states “Coal ash contains many toxic metals, including arsenic, which unchecked, can leak into ground water and be extremely hazardous to breathe”

    NRDC states that coal ash “is contaminated by 10 metals classified as toxic by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR): Antimony, Arsenic, Beryllium, Cadmium, Chromium, Cobalt, Lead, Manganese, Mercury, Nickel and Selenium.”

    NRDCs states “Coal-fired power plants produced more than 126 million tons of contaminated coal waste”

    It also states “the waste produced in a single year contains nearly 100,000 tons of toxic metals”

    This is the waste that Calstar wants to make bricks of and sell to unsuspecting consumers.

    Bricks that are laced with toxic metals.

    Toxic metals that leach out from the bricks – according to Calstar’s own data.

    Calstar would like people to believe that the toxicity of fly ash is not an issue.

    Calstar would like people to believe that bricks made from a Contaminated Coal Waste laced with toxic metals are not an issue.

    Calstar would lke people to believe that it is “beneficially recycling” toxic fly ash and producing a “Green” product.

    How is a product that is laced with toxic metals “Beneficial”? Beneficial for lining Calstar’s managements pockets?

    How is a product that is laced with toxic metals that leach out “Green”? Is polluting the environment and poisoning people with a contaminated waste the new “Green”? Perhaps the “Green” is the money Calstar is hoping to make from selling the toxic bricks.

    Does the management of Calstar have any decency?

    Calstar – a company bereft of morals, trying to sell the new Asbestos.

Comment on this post
OnEarth is a quarterly magazine of thought and opinion on the environment. OnEarth and the Greenlight blog are open to diverse points of view; the opinions expressed by contributors, online commenters, and the editors are their own and not necessarily those of NRDC.


Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | About OnEarth | All Authors | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Media Kit | Contact the Editors | NRDC Home

NRDC