OnEarth Magazine: Subscribe | Current Issue
Your OnEarth: Login / Register
Groundbreaking journalism needs your support
SUBSCRIBE TODAY and enjoy a special introductory offer: A full year for just $15!

Poseidon Lost

We thought the sea was infinite and inexhaustible. It is not. Calling for a new vision to save our oceans. Table of Contents | Digital Edition
Guardian Environmental Network

Chernobyl: Now Open to Tourists

image of Peter Walker
How close do you want to get to the Chernobyl reactor 4, the site of the worst nuclear accident in history?
Ukraine announces official tours of 1986 nuclear disaster site

Already been to North Korea? HikingĀ in Afghanistan a little bit too last year? Fear not. Tourism has a new frontier: the site of the world's biggest civilian nuclear disaster.

From next year the heavily contaminated area around the Chernobyl power plant will be officially open to tourists with an interest in post-apocalyptic vistas, late-period Soviet history, or both.

Ukraine's emergency situations ministry said today that visitors would be offered tours inside the 30-mile exclusion zone set up after reactor four at the plant exploded on 26 April 1986, showering northern Europe in radioactive fallout.

The disaster killed an unknown number of people -- estimates for deaths from radiation exposure range from dozens to thousands -- and forced around 350,000 people to leave their homes forever.

Guardian Environment NetworkWhile the area remains heavily contaminated, a ministry spokeswoman said, tourism routes had been drawn up which would cover the main sights while steering clear of the dangerous spots.

Wandering would not be encouraged, Yulia Yershova said: "There are things to see there if one follows the official route and doesn't stray away from the group."

It is already possible to visit the area with private tour firms, usually operating from Ukraine's capital, Kiev, 60 miles south. The country's government, however, says these are illegal and tourists' safety cannot be guaranteed.

The itinerary of one such tour, which takes in the nuclear plant and even the remains of the number four reactor, contains elements as lunch (food is delivered from outside of the Chernobyl zone), passage through the Dytyatky control point and measuring of radiation.

Apart from seeing the remnants of one of the late 20th century's most dramatic events, trips to the exclusion zone offer visitors a peek into a macabre, Marie Celeste world where tens of thousands of homes were abandoned. Particularly chilling is Prypyat, once a 50,000-strong city but now a ghost town, where books still sit on school desks and May Day decorations flutter in the streets.

The plant itself, which kept generating power until 2000, still has 2,500 staff making the site safe, working in strict shifts to minimise radiation exposure.

Ukraine's government said that it hoped to complete a new sarcophagus for the exploded reactor by 2015. The existing concrete structure is cracking and leaks radiation.

This story originally appeared in the Guardian. OnEarth is part of the Guardian Environment Network.

image of Peter Walker
Peter Walker is a reporter for guardian.co.uk, a position he has held since late 2006. Before that he worked for, among others, Agence France-Presse and CNN in London, Beijing, Hong Kong and Paris.
Lets recap here... Last known condition of the facility? The concrete and steel sarcophagus that entombs the reactor that prevents the worst atomic disater in world history's deadly radion from spilling out into the enviroment, WAS in fact falling apart and leaking huge amounts of radiation out into the surrounding areas... Due to the lack of funds the repair of the facility has gone undone. NOW... The reactor has been opened to tourists... The USSR told its people they were safe when doing the original clean up. They lied and many people died as a result. The question is.. Are they willing to lie again and cost the lives of an unknown number of tourists to gain enough media coverage to generate public interest to have the sarcophagus fixed?
Its funny how people who clearly lack any knowledge of radiation or nuclear disasters like to be over dramatic in their assessment of anything involving the word radiation.